Contributions to the natural history of the United States of North America.

Donate

Advanced Search

Published In:

For:

Pages Select pages to download

Link to this page:

View Text

/page/34117225

Names on this page

-powered by uBio

Contributions to the natural history of the United States of Nor...

Download/About this book

«previous next»

Darwin's copy of this bookBook List Help

key

‹ › deleted ￭ pinholes visible ⧟ line connects passages

« » inserted ⇑ count up from last line ÷* long division

Edition of Charles Darwin's Reading Notes
by Di Gregorio & Gill
(Darwin Manuscripts Project: darwin.amnh.org)

Annotation Not Available

lines 9—10 underline "peculiarities ... structure"

concepts

lines 12—13 score
lines 12—13 annotation Geograph Distribution?

concepts

lines 21—25 score

concepts

lines 2—12 annotation I believe species genera & classes all equally good or false, as one pleases to call it Botanists far better authority than Zoologists.
from annotation in brown ink p.5 My valuation of Grups.

subjects

concepts

lines 11—15 score
from annotation in brown ink 10 Agassiz explanation of Rudimnts

subjects

concepts

lines 11—12 score
from annotation in brown ink 15 Ambylopsis vy remote affinities.

subjects

concepts

lines 4—26 score
line 25 underline "Proteus anguinus"
line 26 underline "North ... Japan"
from annotation in brown ink p.15 Proteus affinities of

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 12—8 score

subjects

concepts

lines 20—21 score
lines 20—21 annotation Agassiz himself

subjects

concepts

lines 23—25 score

subjects

concepts

lines 4—7 score
lines 4—7 annotation !

subjects

concepts

lines 9—13 unmarked
from annotation in brown ink 24 Admits tht Vertebrata «p.31» probably arose with other types . Well may he say what changes (p. 24) has 30 years produced. in date of appearance of grups^t01

t01 - `in date ... grups' in pencil

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 3—1 score

subjects

concepts

lines 13—16 score
line 14 at "Classes" annotation in 4 great kingdoms

concepts

lines 16—18 score in dark pencil

concepts

⇑lines 2—1 score
⇑line 1 underline "Labyrinthici"
bottom-margin annotation How large a group
from annotation in brown ink 30 Isolated Fam. of Fishes.— «p.42. do» / Fresh-water abnormals

subjects

concepts

⇑line 5 underline "Goniodonts"
⇑lines 4—1 double score
⇑line 4 underline "Chaca"
bottom-margin annotation What? Abnormal? Amblyopsis is so
from annotation in brown ink 30 Isolated Fam. of Fishes.— «p.42. do» / Fresh-water abnormals

subjects

concepts

lines 1—4 score
lines 1—4 annotation !

subjects

concepts

line 5 underline "Radiata"
line 5 annotation ‹Planaria?›
from annotation in brown ink 24 Admits tht Vertebrata «p.31» probably arose with other types . Well may he say what changes (p. 24) has 30 years produced. in date of appearance of grups^t01

t01 - `in date ... grups' in pencil

subjects

concepts

lines 1—6 score
from annotation in brown ink 37 Admits tht conditions do not explain distribution

subjects

concepts

lines 19—22 score
line 19 underline "class"
line 19 annotation ‹⸮›
from annotation in brown ink 38 No class exist without havng som cosmopolitan genera

concepts

lines 22—24 score
line 23 underline "majority"

concepts

⇑lines 7—5 score
⇑lines 7—5 annotation !
from annotation in brown ink 39 On creation of nmber of individuals.

concepts

lines 15—19 score

subjects

concepts

lines 12—24 score
line 21 underline cancelled "single ... only"
line 21 annotation deleted no
from annotation in brown ink 41. Quotes Waterhouse of reprsntation of all orders by Marsupials in Australia

concepts

lines 19—25 score
line 20 underline "Labyrinthici"
line 22 underline "Cestraciontes"
from annotation in brown ink 30 Isolated Fam. of Fishes.— «p.42. do» / Fresh-water abnormals

subjects

concepts

lines 17—19 score

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 2—1 score

subjects

concepts

line 3 at "arrangement"
lines 2—13 annotation but is this a natural arrangement? May there not be parallel differences in different countries; those in same countries being really allied.—
from annotation in brown ink 44 curious table of relations of Scincus with no relation to geograph. Distribution

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 12—7 score

subjects

concepts

lines 8—12 score

concepts

lines 13—15 score
from annotation in brown ink 49 Aquatic animals bigger than terrestrial

subjects

concepts

lines 25—26 score
from annotation in brown ink 53 same species have lived for 30,000 years «or 200,000 years» as inferrd frm coral-reefs.

concepts

lines 8—10 score

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 3—1 double score

subjects

concepts

lines 13—15 score
lines 13—14 underline "seen ... identical"
from annotation in brown ink 58 Chelonians much individual variability.

subjects

concepts

lines 9—10 score

subjects

concepts

line 19 underline "tolerable precision"
lines 18—20 annotation !!

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 4—3 double score
⇑lines 4—3 double score
from annotation in brown ink 61 On Lungs of spiders not really two kinds.

subjects

concepts

bottom-margin apparently unintentional mark

lines 6—11 apparently unintentional mark

⇑lines 10—5 score

concepts

lines 16—31 score
from annotation in brown ink 74. Possible explanation of th strange Mollusc within Synapta

subjects

concepts

lines 13—14 score

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 16—7 score
from annotation in brown ink 82 On Classification of Fishes.

subjects

concepts

lines 2—6 score

concepts

lines 1—2 score

subjects

concepts

lines 4—8 score

concepts

lines 1—13 score
from annotation in brown ink 100 «& 113 & 115» On Embryological & geological Succession .107 «to 111» Classificatory rank & Geolog. Succession.—

concepts

lines 24—28 double score
from annotation in brown ink 100 «& 113 & 115» On Embryological & geological Succession .107 «to 111» Classificatory rank & Geolog. Succession.—

concepts

⇑lines 5—2 score
⇑line 4 underline "1841"
from annotation in brown ink 102 Lund on succession of Types.

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 13—10 score

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 10—8 score
from annotation in brown ink 100 «& 113 & 115» On Embryological & geological Succession .107 «to 111» Classificatory rank & Geolog. Succession.—

concepts

lines 22—25 score
from annotation in brown ink 100 «& 113 & 115» On Embryological & geological Succession .107 «to 111» Classificatory rank & Geolog. Succession.—

subjects

concepts

lines 6—13 score
from annotation in brown ink 100 «& 113 & 115» On Embryological & geological Succession .107 «to 111» Classificatory rank & Geolog. Succession.—

subjects

concepts

lines 22—29 score
from annotation in brown ink 100 «& 113 & 115» On Embryological & geological Succession .107 «to 111» Classificatory rank & Geolog. Succession.—

subjects

concepts

lines 9—16 score
from annotation in brown ink 100 «& 113 & 115» On Embryological & geological Succession .107 «to 111» Classificatory rank & Geolog. Succession.—

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 9—5
⇑line 8 underline "See ... 26"
from annotation in brown ink 100 «& 113 & 115» On Embryological & geological Succession .107 «to 111» Classificatory rank & Geolog. Succession.—

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 10—4 score
from annotation in brown ink 100 «& 113 & 115» On Embryological & geological Succession .107 «to 111» Classificatory rank & Geolog. Succession.—

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 5—3 score
from annotation in brown ink 100 «& 113 & 115» On Embryological & geological Succession .107 «to 111» Classificatory rank & Geolog. Succession.—

subjects

concepts

lines 12—15 score

subjects

concepts

lines 27—29 score

subjects

concepts

lines 4—9 score
from annotation in brown ink 100 «& 113 & 115» On Embryological & geological Succession .107 «to 111» Classificatory rank & Geolog. Succession.—

subjects

concepts

lines 15—17 score
from annotation in brown ink 100 «& 113 & 115» On Embryological & geological Succession .107 «to 111» Classificatory rank & Geolog. Succession.—

subjects

concepts

line 20 score

subjects

concepts

lines 27—29 score

subjects

concepts

lines 30—34 score
lines 30—34 annotation “ ”
lines 31—32 underline "very ... ground"

concepts

lines 10—14 score
line 13 annotation mere analogy
from annotation in brown ink 117 On combinations of characters in old Forms

subjects

concepts

line 14 underline "Ichthyosauri"
line 14 annotation ⸮

subjects

concepts

22—24m
from annotation in brown ink 117 On combinations of characters in old Forms

subjects

concepts

line 25 crossing-out "Crustacea" [corrected to `Cetacea']

concepts

lines 19—21 score

subjects

concepts

lines 1—7 score

subjects

concepts

top-margin annotation All rubbish

concepts

lines 3—4 score
lines 3—4 annotation oldest

subjects

concepts

lines 12—14 annotation !!Eocene Monkey

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 6—4 score

subjects

concepts

lines 7—10 score
lines 7—10 annotation Strepsiptera
from annotation in brown ink 124 Parasites. belong to all orders (.«no» Strepsiptera)

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 10—4 score

concepts

lines 4—10 score

subjects

concepts

lines 13—18 score

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 14—12 apparently unintentional mark

lines 1—6 score
from annotation in brown ink 162 the sentence from Linnaeus about genera

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 9—5 score

concepts

lines 6—10 score

concepts

lines 4—9 score

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 7—4 score
from annotation in brown ink 166 idea of sp. proceeding from single pair almost given up by «all» naturalists !

concepts

lines 19—24 score cancelled

concepts

lines 25—26 score

concepts

lines 28—30 score

concepts

lines 13—18 score
lines 13—18 annotation Assumes that these points are not variable

concepts

⇑lines 3—1 score
⇑lines 3—1 annotation !

subjects

concepts

bottom-margin annotation All this discussion merely shows that no talent can really plainly define principles of Classification

concepts

line 8 underline "sub-orders"
lines 6—8 annotation !

concepts

line 12 underline "sub-families"

concepts

lines 15—16 score
lines 15—16 underline "sub-genera"
lines 15—16 annotation ‹› th

concepts

lines 20—21 underline "large ... subdivisions"

concepts

lines 23—26 score
lines 23—26 annotation !

concepts

⇑lines 7—6 score
⇑lines 7—6 annotation !!

concepts

⇑lines 2—1 score

subjects

concepts

lines 3—5 annotation !

concepts

lines 13—17 score
from annotation in brown ink 172 on th Development of parts in order of importance : I suspect ‹for› «importance» «applies solely to being important for» classification; if so simple case, as might be expected.

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 5—1 score

concepts

⇑lines 14—13 score
⇑line 14 at "type" annotation [?]Parent

concepts

lines 22—24 score

subjects

concepts

lines 9—11 score

subjects

concepts

lines 15—17 score
lines 14—15 annotation but the teeth are in gums

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 12—9 score
⇑line 10 underline "successively ... limited"

subjects

concepts

line 3 score "Natura non facit saltum"

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 9—7 score

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 3—1 score

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 13—10 score

subjects

concepts

lines 6—7 score
from annotation in brown ink 225 on degrees of resemblance of embryos

concepts

lines 11—12 score
from annotation in brown ink 225 on degrees of resemblance of embryos

concepts

lines 15—16 score
from annotation in brown ink 225 on degrees of resemblance of embryos

concepts

lines 1—3 score

subjects

concepts

lines 4—8 score
lines 4—8 annotation erased [?]sub [?]Vars

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 13—7 score

concepts

Book contributed by Cambridge University Library