36 COL. W. MUNRO ON THE IDENTIFICATION OF 
LxaxuM, Sp. Pl. 2nd edit. p. 78. 
1. L. spartum, L.! ` 
ConNvuco?rE, Sp. Pl. 1st edit. p. 54. 
. C. cucullatum, L.! 
C. alopecuroides, Mant. p. 28 (1767), is Alopecurus utriculatus, Pers. 
SACCHARUM, l.c. p. 54. 
|" 
. Saccharum officinarum. The specimen marked by Linnzus him- 
self is not the true Sugar-cane, but is Erianthus Japonicus, P. de B. 
It is also wrongly marked in pencil, ** Sacch. polystachyum, Sw.? ” 
which is Panicum ferrugineum, Kunth. The reference to Sloane, 
Jam. p. 108, t. 66, is correct, that being a very fair drawing of 
the true Sugar-cane. 
N 
. S. spicatum is Imperata arundinacea, Cyrill. One specimen is from 
C. B. S., and another has been named by Smith Perotis latifolia, B, 
Willd., i. 324, where, however, the confusion is very great, two or 
three different plants being confounded together. 
S. spontaneum, L.! Mant. p. 183, from Koenig. 
S. Ravenne, Linn. Herb., is Erianthus Ravenne. 
PHawaris, l.c. p. 54. 
P. Canariensis, L. ! 
P. phleoides is Phleum Boehmeri, Wib. 
P. arundinacea, L. ! 
P. eruceformis is Beckmannia eruceformis, Host. 
In IP Ie IX te 
P. oryzoides. One, from Gronovius, is Leersia oryzoides, Sw. ; another 
specimen, from Browne, is Leersia hexandra, Sw. 
The following also in Herbarium :— 
P. bulbosa, Ameen. Acad. iv. 264; 2nd edit, Sp. Pl. p. 79, is Phleum 
tenue, Schrad. 
P. aquatica! Am. Ac. l. c. 
P. zizanioides, Mant. 183, is Andropogon muricatus, Retz. 
P. tuberosa, Mant. 557, is marked by Smith as P. nodosa, Syst. Veg., 
and is the plant now so called. 
P. paradoxa, Linn. Herb., from Upsal Garden, is the plant so called 
now. In MS. notes to 1st edit. it is called by Linn. P. utriculosa, 
with a marginal note “ P. paradoxa, 1665.” 
PASPALUM 
is not a genus of the 1st edit., but appears in the 2nd, p. 81; and 
the following species are in the Herbarium :— 
