THE ORCHIDOLOGY OF INDIA. 87 
219. P. lucescens, Blume, Bijdr. 295, t. 12. 
Borneo, in Sarawak, T. Lobb. 
The unguiculate labellum, with a pair of appendages at its base, 
and the absence of all cohesion between the labellum and lateral 
` Sepals, are characters at variance with the usual structure of this 
genus; and yef it is the original typical species. 
220. P. cultratus, Lindl. Gen. & Sp. p. 234. 
Sikkim, in hot valleys, J. D. Н. (1); Assam, Griffith, Masters. 
It is remarkable that all the specimens examined by me con- 
tinue to be without flowers. 
221. P. microphyllus, Lindl. l.c. 
Khasija, at 3000 feet, J. D. H. (84); Penang, Gaudichaud. 
Blume's P. scalpellifolius, which І have not seen, if accurately 
dissected by his artist, differs in the lip being linear, not broad at 
the base, and cordate ; and in the sepals being almost wholly united, 
like some species of Teniophyllum. In general appearance it is 
undistinguishable from this. 
Note.—Blume's Cryptoglottis serpyllifolia, which I have from 
T. Lobb, gathered in Borneo, is only a Podochilus with an ex- 
cessive development of the lateral sepals into a long spur: the 
basal processes of the lip are analogous to those of Podochilus 
lucescens. 
Camanoris, Lindl. Gen. & Sp. p. 219. 
- 222. C. purpurea, Lindl. l.c. Sertum Orch. t. 19. 
E. Bengal, Chittagong, and base of Khasija, J. D. Н. § T. T. (186). 
223. C. pallida.  (Mieropera pallida, Lindl. 1. c.) 
This is not among the collections recently placed in my hands. 
It is undoubtedly nothing more than a Camarotis. 
224. C. PHILIPPINENSIS; folio oblongo oblique obtuso, racemis ar- 
cuatis multifloris, sepalis lateralibus liberis labello suppositis, labello 
subtriangulari saccato-cucullato apice carnoso tridentato incurvo. 
Philippines, Cuming. | 
. Flowers larger than in either of the former, somewhat trian- 
Bular in the bud, apparently fleshy. There is no adhesion between 
the sepals and labellum, as in C. purpurea and pallida, on which 
Account the generic character requires to be modified; and the 
Same is the case in my Saccolabium fasciculatum, ав Prof. Rei- 
Chenbach has suggested, if indeed the leaves and loose flowers of 
that Species really belong to the same plant. : 
