80 THE ORIGIN OF ANGIOSPERMS. 
Scorr, D. H. (1900).—Studies in Fossil Botany. London, 1900. 
—— (1901)—On the Structure and Affinities of Fossil Plants from the Palæozoic 
Rocks.—IV. The Seed-like Fructification of Lepidecarpon, a genus of Lycopo- 
diaceous cones from the Carboniferous Formation. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Ser. B, 
vol. 194, 1901, p. 291. 
Sewand, A. C. (1895).—The Wealden Flora.—Part П. Gymnosperme. Catalogue of 
the Mesozoic Plants in the British Museum (Nat. Hist.), London, 1895. 
SHOEMAKER, D. М. (1905).—On the Development of Hamamelis virginiana, Bot. Gaz. 
vol. xxxix. 1905, p. 248. 
SorMs-LavnacH, H., GRAF zv (1890).— Ueber die Fructification von Bennettites Gibsonianus 
Carr, Bot. Zeit. for 1890, рр. 789, 805, 821, 843, Translation in Ann. of Bot. 
vol. v. 1891, p. 419. 
—— (1891).— Fossil Boteny. (Engl. Trans.) Oxford, 1891. 
SrRAsBURGER, Е. (1905).—Die Samenanlage von Dronys Winteri und die Endosperm- 
bildung bei Angiospermen. Flora, vol. xcv. 1905, p. 215. 
Твков, М. (1891).—Sur les Casuarinées et leur place dans le système naturel. Ann. Jard. 
Bot, Buitenzorg, vol. x. 1891, p. 145. 
WALLACE, А. В. (1889).— Darwinism. London, 1889. 
WIELAND, G. К. (1899).—4 Study of some American Fossil Cycads. Parts I-III. Amer. 
Journ. Sci, Ser. 4, vol. vii. 1899, pp. 219, 805, 383. 
—— (1901).—A Study of some American Fossil Cycads. Pt. IV. On the Micro- 
sporangiate Fructification of Cycadeoidea. Amer. Journ, Sci. Ser. 4, vol. xi. 1901, 
p. 423. 
(1906).—A merican Fossil Cycads. Washington, 1906. 
У илламзом, W. С. (1870).—Contributions towards the History of Zamia gigas Lindl. & 
Hutt. Trans, Linn. Soc. London, vol. xxvi. 1870, p. 663. 
WiLLis, J. C. (1904).—A Manual and Dictionary ofthe Flowering Plants and Ferns. 
2nd Edit. Cambridge, 1904. 
Vaiss, Н. ре (1901).—Die Mutationstheorie. Vols. I-II. Leipzig, 1901-03. 
(1905).—Species and Varieties. "Their Origin by Mutation. London, 1905. 
Yates, J. (1855).—Notice of Zamia gigas, a fossil plant occurring on the Х.Е. coast of 
Yorkshire. Proc. Yorkshire Phil. Soc, (read 1847), 1855, p. 37. 
