234 47. BOSACE.E: BTJBE^!. 



" Berries yellow, rather sour " (Henry), 



This differs from what we regard as typical R. Lambertianus 

 in being almost wholly glabrous, and in the leaves being very 

 obscurely lobed, and, perhaps, also in the colour of the fruit ; for 

 Kuntze states that the latter has red berries. 



19. Rubus leucanthus, Hance in Walp. Ann. ii. p. 468, et in 

 Journ. Bot. 1884, p. 42 ; Benth. Fl. Hongh. p. 105 ; S. Moore in 

 Journ. Bot. 1880, p. 2 ; Maxim, in Mel. Biol. viii. p. 394 ; Kuntze, 

 MethodiJc, p. 122. 



Rubus glaberrimus, Champ, in Hook. Kew Journ. Bot. iv. p. 80. 



Rubus paradoxus, S. Moore in Journ. Bot. 1878, p. 132, et 1880, p. 2. 



Kwangtttng: Lofaushan (Fordl); Hongkong (Champion I 

 Wilford ! Wright !) ; Hainan (B. C. Henry !). Mus. Brit. ; Herb. 

 Kew. 



Rubus paradoxus, as Moore subsequently ascertained, is nothing 

 else than a simple-leaved state of this species. 



20. Rubus moluccanus, Linn. Sp. Fl. ed. 1, p. 1197; DC. 

 Prodr. ii. p. 566; Hook.f. Fl. Brit. Ind. ii. p. 330, pro parte. 



Rubus rugosus, Smith in Rees's Cyclop, xxx. Rubus, 34. 

 Kwangtttng: Lofaushan at 1000 feet (Fordl). Mus. Brit.; 

 Herb. Kew. 



Very variable and widely spread in the warmer parts of Asia. 



21. Rubus paciflcus, Hance in Journ. Bot. 1874, p. 259, et 

 1884, p. 42. 



Kiangsi: Kiukiang (Mcellendorff, hb. Hance I Shearer I). 

 Mus. Brit. ; Herb. Kew. 



22. Rubus palmatus, Thunb. Fl. Jap. p. 217, et Ic. PI. Jap. 

 dec. iv. t. 6 ; Maxim, in Mel. Biol. viii. p. 384. 



Chekiang: JSmgpo hills (Wilson, hb. Forbes I); Koeean 

 Abchipelago ? (Oldham !). Herb. Kew. 



There is some doubt whether Oldham's specimen of this 

 common Japanese species was collected within our limits, though 

 Maximowicz cites it. The Kew specimen is labelled " Oldham's 

 Japan and Corean Archipelago Coll. 1862-63." 



23. Rubus paniculatus, Smith in Rees's Cyclop, xxx. Eubus, 41 ; 

 DC. Prodr. ii. p. 567 ; Hook.f. Fl. Brit. Ind. ii. p. 329. 



Kiangsu and Chekiang (Poli ex Franchet in litt.). 

 We have seen no Chinese specimens that we could refer to 

 this common Himalayan species. 



