182 MR. H. BOLUS'S CONTRIBUTIONS 
Satyrium triste, Linn. f., Suppl. (1781), 402. 
Limodorum triste, Thunb., Prodr. Plant. Cap. (1794), 4. 
9. EULOPHIA BARBATA, Spreng., Syst. Veg. ii. (1826), 720.— 
Southern districts. 
Serapias capensis, Linn., Mant. (1771), 293. 
Limodorum barbatum, Thunb., Prodr. Pl. Cap. (1794), 4. 
E. ovalis, Lindl., Comp. Bot. Mag. ii. (1836), 202. 
3. E. ACULEATA, Spreng., Syst. Veg. iii. (1826), 720 — Western 
districts. 
Satyrium capense, Linn., Amen. Acad. vi. (1763), 110; Sp. 
Plant. 1339. 
Satyrium aculeatum, Linn. f., Suppl. (1781), 402. 
S. pedicellatum, Linn. f., Suppl. (1781), 402. 
Serapias aculeata, Thunb., Prodr. (1794), 3. 
Serapias pedicellata, Thunb., Prodr. (1794), 3. 
Cymbidium aculeatum, Sw., in Schrad. Journ. ii. (1799), 225. 
C. pedicellatum, Sw., l. c. 224. 
Cyrtopera pedicellata, Lindl., Gen. & Sp. Orch. (1833), 190. 
Cymbidium plicatum, Harv., in Comp. Bot. Mag. ii. (1836), 
208; Hook. Icon. Plant. t. 104. 
Eulophia odontoglossa, Reichb. f., in Linnea, xix. (1847), 373, 
xx. 684; (ex Reichb. f., in Flora (1883), 463). 
Eulophia plieata, Bolus, in Journ. Linn. Soc., Bot. xix. (1882), 
836 (excl. syn. in part). 
4. E. ntans, Spreng., Syst. Veg. ii. (1826), 720.—S.-Eastern 
to Natal. 
Limodorum hians, Thunb., Prodr. Plant. Cap. (1794), 3; Flor. 
Cap. (1823), 30. 
(Satyrium hians, Linn. f., Suppl. 401, quoted by Swartz (in 
Kongl. Vet. Acad. Handl. 243) as a synonym of the last named, 
is, according to the specimen in the Linnean herbarium, a species 
of Disa, perhaps D. lacera, Sw., as Lindley thought (Gen. & Sp. 
Orch.354). But it does not follow that E. hians of Sprengel 
should be expunged from the system (as Lindley maintained in 
Comp. Bot. Mag. ii. (1836), 202), since Sprengel based his de- 
scription on Thunberg’s plant, and not on Linn&us’s ; and, on the 
authority of Mr. N. E. Brown, it undoubtedly agrees with Limo- 
dorum hians in Thunberg's herbarium, and is a Eulophia.) 
E. clavicornis, Lindl., in Comp. Bot. Mag. ii. (1836), 202. 
E. emarginata, Lindl., in Comp. Bot. Mag. ii. (1836), 202. 
