Beiblatt zu den Botanischen Jahrbüchern. Nr. 57. 27 
petiolorum longitudine, foliorum petalorumque forma, calyce fructifero clauso diversa ; 
non proxima C. Wrigthii et C. viscosissimae ut cl. Watson opinatus est. 
C. lobophora Koehne. Huc pertinent exemplaria a. cl. PuiNGLE sub 
n. 4586 in civitate mexicana Jalisco in collibus prope Magdalena collecta et 
distributa sub nomine »C, bracteata Hook. et Arn. non Lag.«, quae deter- 
minatio utrum recta sit an erronea nescio. Descriptio enim a cl. Hooker et 
AnNorr data nimium incompleta. Equidem olim horum autorum C. bractealam 
inter C. Hookerianae Walp. synonyma cum interrogationis signo enumeravi. 
J. Wrightii A. Gr. Huc pertinet planta in civitate mexicana in »Rio 
Hondo Canyon« a cl. Prince sub n. 3147! collecta, sub nom. »C. Tolucana 
Peyr.?« distributa neque vero a C. Wrightii notis specificis ullis diversa. 
C. secundiflora Sess. et Moc. in DC. (cf. Korune in Enerer’s Jahrb. VII 
p. #0, eum synonymo C. lepfopoda Hemsley). An hue pertinet planta in 
civitate Guadalajara sub n. 299 collecta et ipsa quoque sub nom. »C. Tolu- 
cana Peyr.?« a cl. Warson distributa? De hae enim dieit el. Warsow (Proc. 
Amer. Acad. XXII 4887 p. 442): »like the nearly allied C. Palmeri it has a 
broad ascending disk instead of the peculiar compressed helicoid one of 
C. Wrightü.« Discus ascendens C. secundifloram, C. Wrightii habitu similem, 
indicare videtur, sed quoad affinitatem S. Warsow errore deceptus est. 
Cuphea Palmeri enim nec Cupheae Wrightii nec C. secundiflorae sed €. glosso- 
slomae proxima est (cf. supra sub C. Palmeri). 
Praeterea S. Watson profert haec: Pringle n. 299 (i. e. C. Tolucana sensu 
Watsoniano) »is the same as BounagAv's 611 and 2829, referred by Koenne 
to C. Wrightü.« Sed in his speeiminibus Bourgeauanis non adest »a broad 
ascending disk«, sed »the peculiar compressed helicoid one of C. Wrightüi« 
ut et olim observavi et nunc iterum observo. Numeros Bounagau 611 et 
9829 rectissime igitur ad C. Wrightii duxi ac duco. 
C. hybogyna!) Koehne n. sp. (Sect. Melvilla subs. Pachycalya). 
Icon: Koehne Atl. ined. t. 43 fig. 375. 
Frutex ramulis dense brevissimeque hirtellis cortice demum rimoso- 
soluto. Folia opposita brevissime petiolata, e basi subcordata ovalia v. ob- 
longa, 1,5—3,5 em longa, 6—17 mm lata, acuta v. vix acuminata margine 
subrevoluta, subtus magis quam supra pilis brevibus adpressis scabrius- 
cula supra nitidula. Flores interpetiolares; pedicelli cire. 2-—3 mm longi, 
ad !/, prophyllis 2 ovatis viridibus muniti, ut ramuli vestiti. Calyx 28 
—32 mm longus, breviter et subineurvatim calcaratus, crassus dorso con- 
vexus infra faucem angustatus, hirtellus coccineus; lobi subaequales; 
appendices iisdem !/, breviores crassae obtusae hispidulae virides. Petala 
lobos haud superantia subcordato-rotundata verisimiliter violacea. 
Stamina ad tubi 4/; lineae fere rectae inserta, 5 majora lobos vix superantia 
filamentis 2 dorsalibus pilosiuseulis ceteris glabris, 4 minora illis !/; breviora 
filamentis villosiusculis, 2 brevia majoribus !/; breviora sed vix inferius in- 
4) Graece foc = gibber. 
