9 Beiblatt zu den Botanischen Jahrbüchern. Nr. 68. 
la Universidad de Chile, scattered over 40 years. For the record of the 
species therein trealed of, I rely on F. PnıLippr (Catalogus Plantarum Vas- 
cularum Chilensium, Santiago 1884). The Anales are distributed only, not 
published, so that it is difficult to find a complete series of them; nor 
have I been able to see even the descriptions of some species of Cypera- 
ceae cited therefrom. 
Among other works cited below are: 
4. Morina, History of Chili (Translation), London 1809. This contains 
one Scirpus, described so that no one has been able to discover 
what it was. 
2. Presı (Reliquiae Haenkeanae, Prag 1830) records half-a-dozen 
species from Chile, or perhaps from Chile. The series of Presr’s 
types is imperfect in herb. Kew; when the type is not here, I can 
only say of a species like Cyperus laetus, Presl, from Chile, that 
I have never seen a Cyperus that shews the characteristic features 
of Pnzsr's diagnosis. 
J. J. D. Hooker, Flora Antarctica pars 2 (1847) p. 360, describes 
6 species of Cyperaceae (besides Carex) from the extreme South 
of Chile. 
4. Steuer, Synopsis Plantarum Cyperacearum (Stuttgart 1855), des- 
eribes a few new Chile Cyperaceae, from Leenzer’s collections. A 
larger list of LecuLer’s Cyperaceous numbers with names by STEUDEL, 
but without descriptions is given in Lecnıer, Berberides Americae 
Australis (Stuttgart 1857): two Maclovian species are given on p. 50, 
twelve Chile sp. on p. 53; exclusive of Carex and Uneinia. 
. Hemsıey, Voyage of Challenger, Vol. 4 (London 1885), records 5 spe- 
cies of Cyperaceae (besides Cariceae) in Juan Fernandez. 
6. FRANcHET, Mission Scientifique du Cap Horn, v. 5 Botanique (Paris 
1889) p. 373 records 5 species of Cyperaceae (other than Carex) 
from the South of Chile. 
7. Jonow, Flora de Juan Fernandez (Santiago 1896) p. 142, 143, records 
6 species of Cyperaceae (besides Cariceae). 
I have, of course, cited the eminent Monographers of Cyperaceae, 
Kunta and BoEckELER, in all cases. I have picked up also some of the 
new Chile species which BogckeLer has scattered in various publications; 
I can hardly hope to have discovered all. 
I have frequently cited Bentuam’s Flora Australia, GrisepacH’s Sym- 
bolae Argentinae, etc. with the object of shewing the distribution of à 
species in the Southern Zone or neighbouring countries. 
otc 
