t 



which is L. Placet , a 

 another plant from Bridg 



ety of L. nitida; and he has 

 s. with which we are unac- 



quainted, No. 269, as our L. Placet, 



It is no doubt possible that physiologically L. nitida and 

 Placei may be the same ; but they can only be united when 

 Rosa spinosissima and R. indica, Rubus fruticosus and R. 



ylifolius, Frag 



vesca and F. collina, and all such 



species, recognised by every Botanist, are united 

 proposition in which we are far from unwilling to 

 but for which Botanists are not yet prepared. 



a 



J. L 



