21 
23. 
24. 
25. 
26. 
71 
** Lip undivided, serrate or toothed. 
E. propinquum (Richard, l.c.); “caule tereti? fol. ob- 
longo-lanceolatis obtusiusculis ; racemis 4-floris ; flor. 
brunneis : labello adnato cordato, margine denticulato.” 
—— Mexico. —— | 
2. E. ledifolium (Richard, l. c.); “ caule tereti.: fol. lan- 
ceolato-linearibus obtusiusculis ; flor. parvulis luteis ra- 
cemum simplicem lateralem sessilem efformantibus : 
labello adnato, orbiculari vix acuto, denticulato-sinuoso.” 
— Mexico. —— 
E. subulatifolium (Richard, 1. c.); “ fol. teretibus subu- 
latis acutis ; scapo 4-5-floro ; flor. intense luteis parvulis : 
labello suborbiculari integro, sinuoso.” —— Mexico. 
E. orgyale (Lindl. in Aun. Nat. Hist. 12); caule orgyali 
distiche foliato, foliis ovato-oblongis margine vaginisque 
scabris, racemo sessili erecto cylindraceo bracteis mem- 
branaceis subulatis, floribus carnosis, sepalis ovalibus, 
petalis spathulato-linearibus serrulatis, labello cordato 
serrulato callis duobus juxta basin unoque sulcato minore 
sub apice.—— Santa Fé de Bogota. Stem five feet 
high. Flowers apparently yellow. The fistula of the 
ovary inflated. A 
E. imbricatum (Lindl. Gen. & Sp. Orch. no. 71); foliis 
distichis lineari-oblongis obtusis, caule ramoso, spicis 
ovato-oblongis imbricatis, sepalis petalisque ovatis acutis 
æqualibus erectis, labello ovato acuto obsoleté crenulato, 
bracteis carinatis obtusis.—— Brazel.—— adir 
E. fimbriatum (H. B. K. 1.851. E. alternans, Lindl. in 
Hooker's Journal, 3. 88); foliis distichis oblongo-linea- 
ribus oblique retusis margine vaginisque scabris, racemo 
angusto terminali, floribus subsessilibus, sepalis lineari- 
bus retusis, petalis conformibus serratis, labello subro- 
tundo-ovato serrato bilamellato columns man: adnato. 
Var. a. bracteis ovatis herbaceis obtusis pedicello longi- 
oribus, racemo corymboso, floribus majoribus. Var. f. 
bracteis minimis acutis pedicello brevioribus, racemo 
flexuoso, floribus duplo minoribus. —— Peru.——Slender 
plants about six inches high, with small racemose flowers. 
The var. B. is smaller in all its prs but in the struc- 
ture of the flowers themselves I find no appreciable 
difference. 
