[ >3 ] 

 description given by Coudaminc of a lpccie> of Cinchona 

 growing on difrfummta of mounaln^ and of awhiiiih 

 appearance, it fliould Teem to be this. 



3. C. macrocarpa. So named from the fupcrior fizc of 

 the fruit in companion to that of thcothci -. 

 end by Minis in hrgi 



[btcd-y this fpecics will 

 defcrihes in the twelfth edition oil 

 On comparing IJDiuBUfadCftriplfonwitfa that of Conda- 

 niinc. tod die figure given by him of C. offii 



il by no means agrees with it; but on the con- 

 trary it perfectly accords with my own of the C. macro* 

 carpa : and of this I am the tnoK 



verfent rpecimens into Europe of thcC. olfic innli<,it being 

 never found at Santa \i ; and lalth , that the Ipccimcn 

 Ch-m iocarpa,and 

 not officinalis ; its bark is white, and ratK. 

 than that of the nfiii IssHa. Soma year* ngo n quantity 

 of it was imported to Madrid, and Was tried liy ftvcral 

 v. in. all agreed, in declaring it equal to the 

 Peruvian. 



4. C. Caribxa. DctcribcdinthcPhilofophicalTranlac- 

 liomhva Mr. Wright. 



5. C. floribiinda, orQatwjaiM Pfeofl of Monf. Badicr, 

 Thcbaikof theft two Ipcciei U found of equal efficacy in 



