808 MR, C. B. CLARKE ON CERTAIN 
Fairbairn. J. E. S.;” and I suppose to have been added by 
Sir J. E. Smith; it is Pycreus flavescens, Nees. 
Under Pycrevs nirens, Nees, I cite Cyperus pumilus, Linn., 
Sp. Pl. ed. 2, p. 69. 
Cyperus TriFLorts, Linn. Mant. p. 180. 
One sheet, marked “ Cyperus triflorus’’ in Linneus’s hand, is 
Finbristylis tristachya, Thw. 
Cyrervs stricosvus, Sp. Pl. ed. 1, p. 14, p. 47. 
One sheet, marked “ 14. strigosus” in Linneus’s hand, is 
Mariscus strigosus. The figure cited, viz. Sloane, Jamaica, t. 74. 
figg. 2, 8, cannot (in my judgment) have been drawn from 
MM. strigosus [I think t. 74. fig. 1 perhaps was]. Under Mants- 
cts strigosus I cite C. strigosus, Linn. Sp. Pl. ed. 1, p. 14, n. 47 
(tab. Sloane excl.), et herb. propr. 
Cypervs LiatLaris, Sp. Pl. ed. 2, p. 70, n. 19. 
One sheet, marked “ Cyp. ligularis’”’ in Linneus’s hand, is 
Mariscus rufus, H. B. K.—Cyperus ligularis, Linn., is (as to 
diagnosis, picture cited, and authentic example) Mariscus rufus, 
H. B. K. 
Cyrverus Papyrus, Sp. Pl. ed.1, p. 47, n. 15. 
One sheet, marked “ Papyrus” in Linneus’s hand, is Cyperus 
Papyrus, Linn. 
Linneus’s diagnosis of this species is remarkable—“ umbella 
simplici, pedunculis simplicissimis distiche spicatis.” But I think 
there is no doubt that Linneus had the right plant; and I make 
Cyperus Papyrus, Linn., to be Goon. 
Crrerts arunpInacevs, Sp. Pl. ed. 1, p. 44, n. 8. 
C. ferrugineus, Sp. Pl. ed. 2, p. 63 in citat. 
Schenus spathaceus, Sp. Pl. ed. 2, p- 63, n. 4. 
One sheet, marked originally “3. arundinaceus ” in Linneus’s 
hand. He then struck out “arundinaceus”’ and substituted 
“alternifolius;” he then struck out “ alternifolius’’ and sub- 
stituted “ vaginatus,” which now stands on the sheet. The plant 
is Dulichium spathaceum, L. C. Rich. ‘ 
The diagnoses and citations of Linneus agree; and his three 
names above are all reduced under DuticnHiuM sPATHACEUM, 
L. C. Rich. 
