AUTHENTIC CYPERACEE OF LINNEUS. 311 
B, marked “ Scirpus setaceus ” in Linnzus’s hand, is too young 
for certain determination, but appears to me to be also Scirpus 
cernuus, Vahl. 
The figure cited, Morison, sect. 8, t. 10. fig. 23, will do equally 
well for S. setaceus or S. cernuus. 
I think it is certain that Linneus would reckon S. setaceus and 
S. cernuus one species. Now that these are separated, I keep 
the name Sc. setaceus, Linn., for the plant. auctorum [¢f. Benth. 
Fl. Austral. vii. p. 327]. 
Scrreus suprnvs, Sp. Pl. ed. 1, p. 49, n. 12. 
One sheet, marked in Linnzus’s hand “12. supinus,” is Alisma 
ranunculoides, Liun. 
The description of Linneus will not apply at all to this Alisma. 
The species will therefore stand 
Scirpus suprnvs, Linn. Sp. Pl. p. 49, ed. 2, p. 73, 
neque herb. propr. 
Scrrpus AUTUMNALTIS, Linn. Mant. p. 180. 
One sheet, marked “ Scirpus autumnalis ” in Linneus’s hand, is 
FimprisTYLis AUTUMNALIS, Roem. et Sch., var. 3. geminata (sp.), 
Kunth. 
ScrrPUS CAPILLARIS, Sp. Pl. ed. 1, p. 49, n. 13. 
One sheet, marked ‘13. capillaris”’ in Linneus’s hand, is 
Bulbostylis capillaris, Kunth. 
Of the two pictures cited by Linneus, Burm. Zeyl. t. 47. fig. 2, 
is probably Bulbostylis capillaris; Pluk. Alm. t. 300. fig. 5, 
certainly not. 
Under Bunpostytis caprtuaris, Kunth, I cite Scirpus ca- 
pillaris, Linn. Sp. Pl. ed.1, p. 49 (tab. Pluk. citat. excl.). 
Scrrpvus tristacuyros, Linn. f. Suppl. p. 103. 
Two sheets, marked “ tristachyos”’ in Linnzus’s hand, are 
Frornra tristacuya, WVees (vix Kunth, who excludes Linn., but 
admits Rottb.). 
{ Added is one sheet marked, not by Linneus, Scirpus trispi- 
catus, Linn. f. Suppl.; this is Fieinia sylvatica, Kunth. | 
Scrrets mucronatus, Sp. Pl. ed. 1, p. 50, n. 14. 
One sheet, marked “14. mucronatus” in Linneus’s hand, is 
Scirpus mucronatus, Liun. 
