T T ERN 
Supplement, $c.] cxivim. oRcHIDEE. (J. D. Hooker.) 197 
P. 55. Forl. S. GEMINATUM read GEMMATUM. 
, P. 60, Under the citations for 20, S. CALCEOLARE; in line 2, for Bot. Reg. 1883, 
Misc. 130, read 1838, Misc. 75. 
H s 62, To syns. of 29. S. LONGIFOLIUM add JErides rigidum, Smith in Rees. 
yelop. 
30. S. WIGHTIANUM, under the syns. place Thwaites Enum. 303. after Lindl. 
Fol. Orchid, 2. 
P.88. 3. G. JAVANICA, add to habitats, CEYLON, on roots of coffee trees in the 
Central Province, Thwaites. 
P.107. 1. Z. SULCATA, add to syns. Orchis strateumatica, Linn. Sp. Pl. 908. 
pa 16. 5. H. sroncara, add to syns. Rhamphidia elongata, Thwaites Enum, 
3; and to habitats, Ceyton, alt. 4000 ft., Thwaites. 
P.Ml. 30. Habenaria longecalcarata. Two species are confounded here, having 
n mixed up in Wight’s descriptions, Icones and Herbarium; they are— : 
í 30. H. LoNGEcALCARATA, A. Rich. (Wight Ic. t. 925, Dalz. & Gibs. Le.) with 
aw (2-3) very large flowers, large cucullate sheathing bracts much shorter than the 
"ng-pedicelled ovary, lip twice as long as the sepals. 
30/1. H. DECIPIENS, Wight Ic. vol. v. pt. i. p. 14, with several (4-8) smaller flowers, 
NN ort pedicels, lanceolate bracts nearly as long as the ovary, lip rather longer than 
S Spas H. montana, Wight (not of A. Rich.) Ic. t. 827, and 1714 the upper 
adt and the left hand figures only.— This much resembles H. longicornu Lindl. 
oth taa, A. Rich.) but bas a longer lip and much longer spur. Wight has given it 
Dames in his Herbarium, and says there that it is intermediate between 
Sa and longecalcarata. 
EX 48. H. CHLORINA, insert Par. j^ before Reichb. f. H 
Bee a i a H. CRASSIFOLIA, add to syns, P. canarensis, Lindl, Plant. Hohenack. 
aby 165. 106. H. pxoreiENs. This name being confirmed for Wight’s plant (see 
e) must be replaced by H. GRIFFITHII 
I INDIAN ORCHIDEJE OF UNDETERMINED AFFINITY. 
the Bbove revision of th i rchids 1 have doubtless overlooked some 
Species that have been published jn dien Orchi of the multitude of works I have 
DECK, and in others that have escaped my notice; and for which I must 
Sby ulgence. There are further some published ones, of which from the incomplete- 
Pda „the descriptions in respect especially of the pollinia, I have been unable to 
gend ` the genera. The chief of these are Koenig Indian species, referred to 
in the Gn p (a genus now known to be peculiar to the New World,) and published 
ta th Part (p, 43 et seq.) of Retz’s Observationes (in 1791). Of these few have 
dien up by subsequent authors. They are for the most part Peninsular and 
isc) all communicated by Heyne, who included a few Malaccan species from 
that presPondents, The descriptions are so full aud good in all but the pollinia, € 
Pi ile tanists may in time recognize many of them. It is unfortunate tha 
€ should not have identified any of them with Rheede’s plates. 
Pidendrum bj : i. 54 — Limodorum bidentatum, 
identatum, Ken. in Retz. Obs. Pt. vi. 54 Willd. Sp. Pl. iv. 124. 
» calceolaria ` » » 45 Mal 
» alceolari MP CR 
^ cle corr terrestre — ,, ” B0 = ? Saccolabium clavatum, 
» » » Lindl. Gen. & Sp. 223. 
, c = Sarcochilus complana- 
» omplanatum ,, » » 50 tus, Hook. f. ante p. 41. 
D Flabellum Veneris » 97 i 
» Fl : . » — Renanthera Arachnites, 
or zris v. Saaronicum ,, » 58 ex. Lindl. Gen. 4 8p. 217. 
» Flos cris ? 64 
» » » 
Pee ee 
