216 PLANT LIFE OF ALABAMA. 
BOLETINUS Kalchbrenner.'! (BOLETOPsIs Hennings.) 
Boletinus decipiens B. & C. 
Ala. Bull. 248. 
Lee County, October, December, 1896 (Baker). 
Boletinus pictus Peck. 
Lee County, Auburn, June, 1897 (Zarle §- Baker). 
Boletinus ravenelii (B. & C.) 
Ala. Bull. 251, under Boletus. 
Lee County, July, 1896 (Underwood §: Earle), 
South Carolina. 
Boletinus subluteus (Peck). 
Ala. Bull. 251. Cornell Bull. 26. In both under Boletus. 
Lee County, Auburn, July, 1890 (Atkinson); October, November, 1896 (Karle). 
STROBILOMYCES Berk. 
Strobilomyces strobilaceus (Scop.) Berk. 
Peters coll. No. 33. Ala. Bull. 252. 
Lawrence County (Peters). Lee County, July, 1896 ( Underwood ¢: Earle). 
New Jersey. Europe. 
Family AGARICACEAE. 
Tribe CANTHARELLEAE, 
CANTHARELLUS Lév. 
Cantharellus cantharellus (L.). 
Ala. Bull. 256. Cornell Bull. 25, as C. cibarius Fr. 
Lee County, Auburn, August, 1890 (Atkinson); Winston County, June, 1896 ( Under- 
wood); Lee County, July, 1896 (Underwood J: Karle). 
Ohio, New Jersey. Europe. 
Edible; commonly known as chantarelle. 
Cantharellus cinnabarinus Schw. 
Ala. Bull. 256. 
Lee County, July, 1896 ( Underwood §: Earle) 
New Jersey. 
Cantharellus floccosus Schw. 
Ala. Bull. 256. 
Winston County, June, 1896 ( Underwood). 
Cantharellus infundibuliformis (Scop.) Fr. 
Ala. Bull. 256. Cornell Bull. 25. 
Lee County, Auburn, August, 1890 (Atkinson). Pileus very much lobed and irreg- 
ular, 
Winston County, June, 1896 ( Underwood). 
New Jersey. Europe. 
Cantharellus petersii B. & C. 
Rav. Fung. Car. Exsic. 5:12. Ala. Bull. 256. Cornell Bull. 25, 
On base of trees. Northern Alabama (Peters). 
Lee County, Auburn, July, 1890 (Atkinson), 
‘Hennings has proposed the name Boletopsis for those species of Boletinae having 
an annulus (Engler & Prantl, Pflanzenfam. 1 Teil, Abt. 1** :194. 1898), but as noted 
by Underwood (Bull. Torr. Club, 25:630) the older name of Boletinus must be 
retained if the species belonging to it are to be included in the new grouping. 
*Hennings’s treatment of the Agaricaceae in the Natuerlichen Pflanzenfamilien 
does not seem to meet the full approval of American mycologists. It seems best, 
therefore, for the purposes of this catalogue to follow the generic names used by 
Saccardo in the Sylloge Fungorum rather than to make the many new binomial 
combinations that would be necessary if Hennings’s treatment of the family were 
to be fully adopted.—F, S. Earle. 
