HITCHCOCK AND CHASE—NORTH AMERICAN PANICUM. 17 
GROUPING OF THE SPECIES. 
The genus Panicum, as here limited, contains two groups sufficiently 
well marked to warrant their segregation as subgenera, namely, 
Paurochaetium and Dichanthelium. Nearly all the remaining species 
group themselves around the central idea of the genus as typified by 
P.miliaceum. In order to avoid assigning to the main portion of the 
genus a name of formal nomenclatorial significance, such as Eupan- 
icum, this group is called true Panicum. There are five outlying 
species which show no close relationships with the others, but are not 
sufficiently distinct to be assigned generic rank. These are placed in 
a final group under “ Miscellaneous Species.’ It is probable that a 
further study of the species in other parts of the world will indicate 
that at least some of these species may, together with extra North 
American allies, be placed in definite subgenera. 
The group true Panicum and the subgenus Dichanthelium are 
susceptible of further division into minor groups, the names of which 
are the plurals of the characteristic species of each group. These 
names are not intended to be formal and should have no nomencla- 
torial standing. The term Angustifolia is used as if we were to say, 
P. angustifolium and its allies. A few tropical species of true Pani- 
cum remain ungrouped, as they have no near allies in North America, 
and there is no advantage in making a group for each species. 
The groups of these two main divisions are arranged to represent 
our judgment as to their relationship, so far as this can be done in a 
lineal sequence. In true Panicum the first group, the Geminata, is 
furthest removed from the typical species, the inflorescence resem- 
bling that of Paspalum. The Capillaria, Diffusa, and Virgata, typical 
groups, are near the center of the series. In the same way, the 
Depauperata are an outlying group of Dichanthelium, the typical 
groups being the Dichotoma and Lanuginosa. 
The species of each group are also arranged to represent their 
affinities, but it is impossible to indicate the difference in the degree 
of relationship. Some of the groups are manifestly more homoge- 
neous than others. The group Geminata, for example, includes two 
closely allied species, P. geminatum and P. paludivagum, and one, 
P. barbinode, in which the affinity is less evident. The latter species 
is placed in the same group as the other two partly as a matter of 
convenience. If there were several other species more closely allied 
to this than to P. geminatum it would have been more convenient to 
segregate these as a separate group. One more example will suffice 
to illustrate the unequal value of the groups. Panicum reptans is 
placed in the group Fasciculata because it is more closely allied to the 
other species of that group than to those of any other group, yet the 
41616°—vor 15—10 
2 
