74 SOCIETY ISLANDS. [Polypodiacece. 



1. Antrophyum plantagineum. Kaulf. /3. Lessoni. — A. Lessoni. Bory in Duperrey Voy. 

 p. 255. t. 28. f. 2. — A. plantagineum. Blume Fl. Jav. t. 30. 



Our plant is exactly the A. plantagineum figured by Blume, and equally the A. Lessoni of Duperrey's 

 Voyage. Nor does the A. Durvillei appear to us to be really distinct from it, according to Bory's description. 



1. Notochlaena pilosa ; frondibus ovato-lanceolatis bi-tripinnatis, pinnulis oblongis remo- 

 tiusculis subtus margineque recurvo prsecipue cum rachibus stipiteque nitidissimo glanduloso- 

 pilosis. 



This is allied to the N. distans of Mr. Brown, but has a broader frond, more lax pinnules, which are quite 

 destitute of the paleaceous setae so copious in the former, and sparingly clothed instead with somewhat glan- 

 dular hairs. 



1. Niphobolus macrocarpus ; frondibus lineari-lanceolatis obtusis inferne in stipitem longi- 

 usculu'm attenuatis subtus incanis, soris serialibus ellipticis magnis prominentibus. (Tab. 

 XVIII.) 



Caudex longus, repens, magnitudine pennse corvinse, adpressim squamosus, hie illic fibrosus; squamis lan- 

 ceolato-subulatis fuscis, margine fimbriatis. Stipites bi-tripollicares, glabri, versus basin articulati, infra arti- 

 culum dense imbricatim squamosi. Frondes palmares, lineari-lanceolatae, obtusse, coriacese, supra areolis (soris 

 oppositis) oblongis depressis, ubique squamulis minutis stellatim pilosis obsitse, demum superne nudoe, inferne 

 semper incanse, margine leviter recurvse. Costa subtus prominens. Sori magni, elliptici, fusci, valde prominentes, 

 in unam seriem intra costam et marginem dispositi, totam dimidiam et superiorem partem frondis occupantes. 

 Tab. XVIII. Niphobolus macrocarpus. Fig. 1, Capsules; fig. 2, Scales from the frond:— magnified. 



1. Polypodium phymatodes. Linn. 



2. Polypodium alter nifolium. Willd. Sp. PL v. 5. p. 168? Bory in Duperrey Voy. v. I. 

 p. 261. 



3. Polypodium latifolium. " Forst. Prodr. n. 457." Schkuhr, Fil. t. 24. 



1. Nephrodium exaltatum. Br. — Aspidium exaltatum. Willd. 



2. Nephrodium propinquum. Br. Prodr. Fl. Nov. Holl. p. 148. Bory in Duperrey Voy. 

 v. 1. p. 269.— Aspidium unitum. Sw.? Schkuhr, Fil. t. 33. b. 



3. Nephrodium nymphale. — Polypodium nymphale. " Forst. Prodr. n. 442." Schkuhr, 

 Fil. t. 34. — Aspidium patens. Sw. — A. molle. Sw. ? 



1. Asplenium Nidus. Linn. 



2. Asplenium obtusatum. " Forst. Prodr. n. 430."— Labill. Nov. Holl. v. 2. p. 93. t. 242. 

 / 2. var. minor, (et A. obliquum. Labill. Nov. Holl. v. 2. p. 93. t. 242. f. 1.) fide Br. in 



Prodr. Fl. Nov. Holl. p. 150. 



3. Asplenium tenerum. " Forst. Prodr. n. 431." Sw. Syn. Fil. p. 78. et 266. Schkuhr, 

 Fil. t. 69. 



1. Diplazium arborescens. Swartz, Syn. Fil. p. 92. Willd. Sp. PI. p. 354. Bory in Du- 

 perrey Voy. v. 1. p. 271. 



We have seen no authentic specimen of D. arboreum; but our plant accords sufliciently with the 

 description. We have received what we consider the same species from St. Vincent in the West Indies, and 

 have doubted if it might not be a more than usually branched state of Asplenium ambiguum. 



1. Doodia Kunthiana. Gaud, in Freyc. Voy. Bot.p. 401. t. 14. 



Although this entirely agrees with the plant above quoted, we are yet unable to decide if it be really 

 distinct from the Doodia caudata of Mr. Brown. The terminal pinnaj can indeed scarcely be said to be 



