* 
292 MR. H. W. PUGSLEY : A REVISION OF THE 
In exemplaribus Fl. Exsice. Austro-Hungarica, No. 29001, flores fruetüsque, 
ut in fumariis cultis expeetandum est, minores sunt. quam in speciminibus 
agrestibus quae el. Th. Pichler in vineis ad montem Marian prope Spalato 
collegit. 
F. Petteri montem Marian prope Spalato, insula Lesinæ Clissam et forsan 
locos alios in Dalmatia habitat. 
The application of the name +. Petteri, Rchb. to this apparently rare 
Dalmatian plant has been decided on only after careful consideration. 
Although it appears from Hammar’s note (Mon. p. 33) that Petter sent out 
various fumitories under this name, it seems fairly certain that the Dalmatian 
plant on which Reichenbach founded his species was that cited in Visiani's 
Fl. Dalmatica, viz. :—* F. media, Petter, Bot. Wegw. No. 421, non Lois.” 
(1832), which was collected by Petter at Spalato. Hammar regards this 
plant as conspecific with /. Thuretii, Boiss., but Boissier (l.e. supra) entirely 
dissents from this view, regarding F. Petteri, Rchb. as allied rather with 
F. Gussonei. Haussknecht reduces F. Petteri, Rchb. to a synonym of 
F. Gussonei, and Haláesy (Fl. Greee. i. 48 (1901)) uses the name in preference 
to F, Gussonei for Boissier’s plant. Koch again likened F. Petteri, Rchb. to 
F. muralis, which he first referred to it (/. c, supra). 
An explanation of these differing views is afforded by the later Spalato 
specimens collected by T. Pichler and referred to F. Petteri, Rehb., which 
agree with Reichenbach’s account, taken in conjunction with the diagnoses in 
the Floras of Dalmatia and Croatia, and are no doubt identical with Petter’s 
original plant described hy Reichenbach. It may be seen from these 
specimens that while the species produces flowers resembling those of 
F. Thuretii and similarly borne in subsessile racemes, thus accounting For 
Hammar’s union of the two forms, its habit and foliage are very different and 
rather recall F. muralis and F. Gussonei, as was noticed by Koch and 
Boissier respectively. ‘The ovate, attenuate form of the fruit in F. Petteri, 
moreover, is distinctly different from that obtaining in either of these allied 
plants, and hence there seems sufficient reason for maintaining it as a separate 
‘species. 
Hammar's figure of F. Petteri (Mon., tab. iv.) seems compounded of this 
and the following species, the foliage and corolla recalling F. Petter’, and 
the pedicel, sepal and fruit /. T huretii. 
*** Series Sub-Latisepale. 
Sepala majuscula ; petali inferioris margines angustissimi, erecti aut rarius 
subpatentes obscure apice dilatati; frucetüs minimi, plus minusve rugulosi : 
foliorum laeiniz relative angustze ; flores minores in racemis subsessilibus. 
26. Fumaria THureri, Boissier, Diag. Pl. Or. Ser. ut. No. 1, p. 15 (1853) ; 
Fl. Orient. i. 137 (1867) : Haussk. in Flora, lvi. 494 (1873), excl. loc. 
