SOME CRITICAL SPECIES OF ECH!UM. 381 
II. Hers. JussrEv. 
no. 6601 Echium unnamed “ex hort. Bagatelle 1788.” Only the upper half 
I 
6603 
6604 
6605 
6606 
6607 
6611 
6612 
6613 
6614 
6615 
6616 
6617 
6618 
6619 
of a plant which is obviously Æ. lusitanicum herb. Linn.— Brotert, 
Samp. 
contains three sheets with no original name, all labelled by Gay 
“ pyrenaicum,” but only two belong to that species, the third 
being italicum, L. 
labelled by Gay “Æ. italicum L., Willd., Lehm et aliorum nonnull.,” 
is either true italicum, L., or glomeratum, Poir. For lack of time 
I could not examine carefuliy. 
two sheets : 
(1) “E. amplissimo folio lusitanicum. Ech. lusitanicum Jolio 
cubitali T. hb. Isnardi.” 
(2) “ E. amplissimo folio lusitanicum” ex herb. D. Charles.” 
Both specimems are undoubtedly the lusitanicum of herb. Linn. 
“no. 48 Leh. undulatum Pourr. Gallice, envoyé par M. Pourret 
1802," labelled by Gay “ forte E. lusitanicum L.,” which it is, 
being identieal with no. 6605. 
two pieces : 
` (1) * E. rubrum” is rightly corrected by Gay to E. vulgare. 
(2) “ E. ereticum angustifolium rubrum ex hb. D. Charles? is 
vulgare corollis voseis. 
“Echium Insularum Stechadum” is rightly labelled by Gay 
“E. plantagineum,” for it is not the plant so-called in 
Tournefort’s herbarium no. 591. 
two sheets, ex herb. Isnard and ex herb. Charles, both named 
“ Echium creticum latifolium rubrum," but both are E. planta- 
gineum and have been so labelled by Gay. 
“ Echium orientale” is plantagineum as labelled by Gay. This 
must be the specimen alluded to by Poiret, Dict. Encye. viii. 
p. 673, where he says that he has seen Tournefort’s type of 
E. orientale in hb. Jussieu. 
“ Echium ex hisp." do. do. 
* Echium ex hort. R. Paris ” do. do. 
sine nomine, do. do. 
* Echium bonariense ” do. do. 
sine nomine, a scrap do. do. 
two sheets : 
(1) “E. australe Lam. ex hort. reg. Paris, Desf." marked 
“bene” by Gay. 
(2) sine nomine aut loco, Both are precisely the creticum of 
herb. Linn. 
2: K 2 
