Mosa.] ROSACEiE. 



199 



planis, Lindl—Willd. Emm. p. 544. Pursh^ Fl. Am, v. I. p. 34-4, et in SuppL p. 749. Lindl 

 Eos, p. 13. t 2. De Cand. Prodr. v. 2. p. 603. Torrey, FL of Un, St v, 1. p. 485.— R. 

 blanda. Pursk, FL Am. v. }.p. 344. (non AiL) 



Hab. Newfoundland. (Herb. Banks,) Dr. Morrison, Mr. Cormack, Sir Alexander Cochrane. 



2. R. lucida; compacta, aculeis ramorum stipularibus, foliolis oblongis imbricatis planis 

 lucidis, fructu depresso-globoso. Lindl. — '^ Ehrh. Beltr. 4. 22." Jacq. Frag. p. 71. t. 107. 



f. 3. Purshy FL Am. v. 1. p. 344, Elliott, CaroL v. L p. 563. Lindl. Ros. p. 17. Torrcy, 

 Ft. of Un. St. V. I. p. 485. De Cand. Prodr. v. 1. p. (yO^.—DiU. Elth. p. 325. t. 24>5.f. 316. 



Hab. Newfoundland. Sir Alexander Cochrane. — In those specimens which I haye received from Sir 

 A. Cochrane, the calyx-tuhe is naked. 



3. R. Woodsii; stipulis sepalisque conniventibus, foliolis oblongis obtusis glabris. Lindl. 

 Ros. p. 21. De Cand. Prodr. v. 2. p. 604. LindL in Bot. Reg. t. 976. 



Hab. North of the Saskatchawan, as far as Bear Lake. Dr. Richardson. — Of thiii there 'm what Mi-. 

 Borrer considers a var., with the leaves downy beneath, {^atliered about Cumberland-House Fort by Mr. 

 Drummond. 



4. R, Carolina; sUpulis convolutis, foliolis lanceolatis, sepalis patentibus. Lindl. — Linn. 

 Sp.PLp. 703. Pursh, FL Am. v. I. p. 34^1. Elliott, CaroL v. I. p. 565, Lindi. Ros. p. 23. 

 /. 4. Torrey, FL of Un. St. v. 1. p. 486. De Cand. Prodr. v. 1. p. 605, — R. Caroliniana. 

 Bigel. FL Bost. ed. 2. p. 197. — R. Peunsylvanica. Mich. Am. v. I. p. 296. 



Hm. Canada, and as fai* as the Saskatchawan. Dr. Richardson, Drummond. 



5. R. blanda; elatior, armis deciduis, foliolis oblongis planis, petiolo piloso. Lindl. 

 Ait. Hort Kew. ed. 1. v. 2. p. 202. Lindl. Res. p. 25. — R. fraxinifolia, «, De Caml. Prodr. 

 V. 2. p. 606. 



Hab. " North -West coast of America." * Menzies, (in Lindl.) Hudson's Bay, (Herb. Baiiks.) Canada, and 

 as far north as the Bear Lake. Dr. RicJiardsony Drummond. — The specimens in the Collection accord with an 

 authentic one in my Herbarium from Mr. Lindley. " It varies, however, in the abundance of glands on the 

 underside of the leaves and stipules, nor do I know how R. acicidarisj Lindl, (Ros. p. 144. t. 8,) is to be dis- 

 tinguished. There are specimens from Cumberland-House Fort, gathered by Dr. Richardson, in which the 

 shoots are almost as large and prickly as in R.ferox, but not do^vuy. There is, too, a var. foliolis latioribm 

 serraturis dorso crenatis, gathered near Bear Lake by Capt. Back and Lieut Kendal. — Mixed with J{. blanda^ 

 and its broad leaved var. is a Rose unknown to me, of a similar pale hue, y\'\\h. very numerous nearly equal 

 setaceous prickles, petioles slightly hairy, and with a few prickles and setae, leaflets very obtuse, coarsely, 

 sharply, and simply serrated, and naked on both sides. It is probably a species." Borrer, 



6. R. fraxinifolia; elatior inermis, ramis strictis glaucescentibus, foliolis opacis luulu- 

 latis impubibus. Lindl.—" Bork. Holz. 301." Ker. in Bot. Reg. t. 458. LimlL Ros. p. 26. 

 De Cand. Prodr. v. 2. p. 606. 



Hab. North-West coaat of America. {De Cand.) Menzies, (in Herb, nostr.) Douylas, Dr. Scouler. 

 Newfoundlind, (Herb. Banks.)~ln De CandoUe's Prodromus this is stated to be exclusively a native of the 

 North-West coast of America. My specimens are all from that country, and well accord with the figure in 

 the Bot. Reo-ister, above quoted. M, Seringc unites the R. blanda of Hortus Kewensis with the present 

 species. ^ 



This station probably belongs to the foUowiuif spedee. 



