380 WILSON EXPEDITION TO CHINA 



11008 from Yunnan belongs apparently to this species and not to A. argutay where 

 Dunn placed it, 



Actinidia polygama Maximo'wicz in Mem, Sav. £tr. Acad. Sci, SL 

 Petershourg, IX, 64 {Prim, Fl Amur,) (1859); in Bnll Acad. Sd, St. 

 Petershourg, XXXI. 19 (1886); in Mel Biol. XII. 425 (1886).— Miquel 

 in Ann. Mus. Lugd.-BaL III. 15 (1867); Prol, Fl. Jap, 203 (1867). 

 Ito & Kaku, Fig, Descr. PI, KoisUk, BoL Gard, II. t. 20 (1883). 

 Rehder in Mitt. Deutsch. Dendr, Ges, XII. 123 (1903). — Gilg & 

 Loesener in Bot. Jahrh, XXXIV. Beibl. LXXV. 52 (1904) . — Komarov 

 in Act, Hort, Petrop, XXV. 39 {Fl, Mansh.) (1905). — Finet & Gagne- 

 pain in Bull Soc, Bot. France, LII. Mem. IV. 20 (1905); Conir, Fl 

 As, Or. II. 20 (1907). — Schneider, III Handh, Laubholzk. IL 327, 

 fig. 216 f-g, 217 a-f (1909). — Dunn in Jour, Linn, Soc. XXXIX. 403 

 (1911). 



Trochosiigma polygama Siebold & Zuccarini inAhh. Akad. Munch. III. 727, t. 



2, fig. 2(1843). 

 Trochostigma voluhilis Siebold & Zuccarini, 1, c. (1843). 

 Actinidia voluhilis Miquel in Ann. Mus. Lugd.-Bat. III. 15 (1867); Pfol. tl. 



Jap. 203 (1867). 



Western Hupeh: Hsing-shan Hsien, thickets, alt. 1200-1800 m 

 July 1907 (No. 2013, in part; climber 7 m. tall, flowers white); Fang 

 Hsien, thickets, alt. 1200-1800 m., July 1907 (No. 2013, in part); 

 without precise locality, August 1901 (Veitch Exped. No. 1363^); with- 

 out precise locality, A, Henry (Nos. 5922, 5922% 5922^ 6644, 767). 

 Eastern Szech^uan: Wushan Hsien, July 1900 (Veitch Exped. 

 No. 1363); same locality. A, Henry (No. 5764). Western Szech'uan: 

 Wa-shan, thickets, alt. 1500-1800 m., June, July and September 18 

 1908 (Nos. 934, 2010; climber 5-7 m. tall, flowers white, fruit golden 



} 



7 



J 



ovoid % in. long, of good flavor); Mupin, alt. 2100 m., October 1908 



(No. 934*; climber 5 m. tall, fruit ovoid, smooth, orange yellow). 



m 



Actinidia polygama has been much confused with A. kolomikta Maximowicz, 

 though it is easily distinguished, even without leaves, by the large solid white pitn 

 of its branches, while A. kolomikta has lamellate brown pith, a character whicn 

 had passed entirely unnoticed until Professor E. Koehne in a letter dated March 24, 

 1899, drew my attention to this remarkable difference in the pith of the two 

 species; this observation I subsequently published in 1903 in Mitt. Deutsch. Dendr. 

 Ges. as quoted above. 



Actinidia kolomikta Maximowicz in Mem, Sav. Str, Acad, Set* SL 

 Petershourg, IX. 63 {Prim. Fl Amur.) (1859); in Bull Acad, Sci^ SL 

 Petershourg, XXXI. 19 (1886) ; in Mel Biol XII. 425 (1886). — Hems- 

 ley in Jour, Unn, Soc. XXIII. 78 (1886). — Andr6 in Rev. HorL 1898, 



