ULMACEAE. — ULMUS 251 
2. Ulmus villosa Brandis in 7nd. Forester, XXV. 230 (1899); Ind. Trees, 594, 
fig. 185 (1906). — Gamble, Man. Ind. Timb. ed. 2, 628 (1902). — Schneider in 
Oester. Bot. Zeitschr. LXVI. (1916). 
Ulmus campestris Brandis, Forest Fl. Ind. 433 (pro parte, non Linnaeus vel 
Auct. Al.) (1874). 
Ulmus campestris Smith, var., Aitchison in Jour. Linn. Soc. XVIII. 93 (1880). 
Ulmus Wallichiana Hooker f., Fl. Brit. Ind. V. 480 (pro parte, non Planchon) 
(1888). 
INDIA. Kashmir: Kulu (or Kullu), D. Brandis (with unripe fruits and with- 
out leaves; co-type); same locality, October 1876, D. Brandis (“a large tree,” ex 
Brandis); Bussahir, “at 6500 ft. in May 1881," D. Brandis (ex Brandis); Kunawar, 
“near Tranda at 7000 ft.,” D. Brandis; Thelum River, “between 5000 and 7000 
ít," J. E. T. Aitchison (“a good sized tree"; ex Brandis). Punjab: Pabar 
Valley, “at an elevation of 4000 ft.” May 1881, D. Brandis (ex Brandis). 
AFGHANISTAN. Kurrum Valley, “in the woods at 7000-9000 ft., not com- 
mon," 1879, J. E. T. Aitchison (No. 677; sterile). : 
I am not quite sure whether all the specimens mentioned by Brandis belong to 
this species or partly to U. Brandisiana Schneider. Aitchison’s No. 677 seems to 
be U. villosa, the leaves of which I know only from Brandis's description and fig- 
ure. His description being somewhat incomplete, I think it best to describe No. 
677 as follows: Arbor magna; ramuli hornotini flavo-rubri, tenuissime scabri, 
vetustiores laevi, cinerascentes, deinde nigrescentes, rimosi ; gemmae nondum satis 
evolutae parvae, ovatae, puberulae, in perularum margine fulvo-ciliatae. Folia 
obovata v. obovato-oblonga, basi cuneata v. rotundata, paulo v. vix asymmetrica, 
apice satis subito in acumen brevem contracta, supra viridia, plus minusve scabra, 
tantum in costa incisa sparse pilosa, subtus in sicco vix pallidiora, scabra, axillis 
nervorum 11-14 (imo apice excluso) albo-barbata, minora obovata v. elliptica, 4-7 
em. longa et 3-4.5 em. lata, maxima obovato-oblonga, 8-12 cm. longa et 5-6.5 
em. lata, margine lobulato-serrata serraturis primariis dorso dentibus 2-4 instructis; 
petioli 3—7 mm. longi, satis tenues, praesertim in sulco ventrali pilosa. 
. Bee also my remarks on No. 403 of Aitchison under Ulmus spec. on p. 265. It 
15 extremely difficult to determine an Ulmus from sterile specimens alone. 
3. Ulmus macrocarpa Hance in Jour. Bot. VI. 332 (November 1, 1868). — Plan- 
chon in Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris, LXXIV. pt. 1, 1498 (1872); in De Candolle, 
Prodr. XVII. 162 (1873). — Maximowicz in Bull. Acad. Sci. St. Pétersbourg, XVIIL. 
289 (1873); in Mél. Biol. IX. 22 (1873). — Franchet in Now. Arch. Mus. Paris, 
sér. 2, VIL 78, t. 8, fig. c (Pl. David. I. 268) (1884). — Hemsley in Jour. Linn. Soc. 
XXVI. 447 (1894). — Komarovin Act. Hort. Petrop. XXII. 81 (Fl. Mansh. IL.) 
(1903). — Nakai in Jour. Coll. Sci. Tokyo, XXXI. 190 (Fl. Kor. IL.) (1911). — 
Schneider, 7U. Handb. Laubholzk. II. 904, fig. 566 h (1912). 
Ulmus sp. novae 2 Maximowicz in Mém. Sav. Étr. Acad. Sci. St. Pétersbourg, 
IX. 477 (Prim. Fl. Amur. Ind. Fl. Pekin.) (nomen nudum) (1859), fide 
Maximowiez. 
?Ulmus rotundifolia Carriére in Rev. Hort. 1868, 374, fig. 40 (October 1, 1868). 
CHINA. Chili: “in montosis prope Jehol,” A. David (No. 1718, ex Plan- 
chon, and Herb. Hance, No. 14538, ex Hance, type); Nankou Pass, November 1905, 
F. N. Meyer (No. 208; sterile branch with corky wings); Nankou, rocky cliffs, 
July 27, 1913, F. N. Meyer (without No.; of shrubby growth; branches winged 
as in No. 208, leaves very small); near Shimen, rocky crevices and loess cliffs, 
August 3, 1913, F. N. Meyer (No. 1088; apparently the same as the preceding 
en, but the leaves partly larger); Shiling, January 25, 1908, F. N. Meyer (No. 
