298 WILSON EXPEDITION TO CHINA 
Morus cuspidata Wallich, Cat. No. 4646 (nomen nudum) (1830), fide Bureau. 
Morus indica Roxburgh, Fl. Ind. ed. 2, III. 596 (non Linnaeus sensu stricto) 
(1832). — Wight, Icon. Pl. Ind. Orient. II. t. 674 (1843). — Miquel in Ann. 
Mus. Lugd.-Bat. II. 198 (1866); Prol. Fl. Jap. 130 (1866). — Brandis, 
Forest Fl. Ind. 408 (1874); Ind. Trees, 612 (1906). — Kurz, Forest Fl. 
Brit. Burma, II. 468 (1877). — Hooker f., Fl. Brit. Ind. V. 492 (1888). — 
Collett, Fl. Siml. 457 (1902). — Gamble, Man. Ind. Timb. ed. 2, 635 (1902), 
an tantum pro parte? 
Morus stylosa Seringe,! Descr. Cult. Muriers, 225 (Atl. 15, t. 22 sub nom. 
M. longistyla) (1855). 
Morus alba, var. nigriformis Bureau in De Candolle, Prodr. XVII. 242 (1873). 
Morus alba, var. cuspidata Bureau, 1. c. 243 (1873). 
Morus alba, var. indica Bureau, l. c. 243 (1873), quoad citat. Seringe. — 
Palibin in Act. Hort. Petrop. XVIII. 191 (Consp. Fl. Korea, II. 45) (1900). 
Morus alba, var. stylosa Bureau in De Candolle, Prodr. XVII. 243 (1873).— 
Shirasawa, Icon. Ess. For. Jap. II. t. 6, fig. 1-11 (1908). — Matsumura, 
Ind. Pl. Jap. II. pt. 2, 40 (1912). — Henry in Elwes & Henry, Trees Great 
Brit. & Irel. VI. 1610 (1912). — Miyabe & Miyake, Fl. Saghal. 407 (1915). 
Morus alba Hemsley in Jour. Linn. Soc. XXVI. 455 (pro parte, non Linnaeus) 
(1894). — E. Pritzel in Bot. Jahrb. XXIX. 297 (1900). — Komarov in Act. 
Hort. Petrop. XXII. 91 (Fl. Mansh. II) (pro parte) (1903). — Matsumura 
& Hayata in Jour. Coll. Sci. Tokyo, XXII. 373 (Enum. Pl. Formos.) (pro 
parte) (1906). — Nakai in Jour. Coll. Sci. Tokyo, XXXI. 193 (Fl. Kor. I.) 
(an pro parte?) (1911). 
Morus Cavaleriei Léveillé in Fedde, Rep. Spec. Nov. X. 146 (1911); Fl. Kouy- 
T'chéou, 434 (1915). 
M ee! longistylus Diels in Not. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh, V. 293 (Pl. Chin. Forrest.) 
1912). 
Morus inusitata Léveillé in Fedde, Rep. Spec. Nov. XIII. 265 (1914). 
Morus bombycis Koidzumi in Tokyo Bot. Mag. XXIX. 313 (1915). : 
Morus japonica Bailey,? Stand. Cycl. Hort. IV. 2070 (pro parte maxima, 
ut videtur non Siebold) (1916). 
Western Hupeh: north and south of Ichang, cliffs, etc., alt. 300— 
1200 m., July 1907 (No. 33; bush 1.8-3 m., fruits dark red, leaves 
variable, “ Ai-sang "); same locality, ete., May 15, 1907 (No. 33°, 2; 
No. 33°, dà); same locality, etc., May 1907 (No. 3306; bush 1.8-2.4 
m. tall; c); same locality, etc., June 1907 (No. 56; bush 3-7 m. tall, 
according to the statement that the fruits are “stylis stigmatibusque persistentibus 
quasi echinata," undoubtedly refers to our species. 
1 Seringe quotes, p. 225, “ Morus stylosa Sering. pl. XXII. (1854),” and in the 
Atlas, p. 15, he gives the name as M. longistyla. According to his quotation it 
seems that the Atlas appeared before the description, but the books before me bot 
bear the date 1855. On p. 229, under Morus indica, Seringe again refers to & 
species ** que je décris sous le nom de Morus longistyla.” 
2 Bailey quotes M. japonica Audibert ex Seringe 226, but Seringe mentions only 
a “ M. japonica jard. Audib." as a synonym of his Morus stylosa (see under M . 
acidosa Griffith). Koidzumi quotes the same name and also a M. japonica 
Noisette, but the last name is also a garden name for a plant in Hort. Noisette. 
Koidzumi's new name, M. bombycis, is not appropriate at all because this Mulberry 
is not (or very rarely?) used to feed silkworms. 
