f 



trichocereus. 



137 



11. 



chiloensis 



1845. 



Cactus chiloensis Colla, Mem. Accad. Sci. Torino 31: 342. 1826. 



Cereus chiloensis De Candolle, Prodr. 3: 465. 1828. 



Ceretis chilensis Pfeiffer, Enum. Cact. 86. 1837. 



Cereus panoplaeatus Monville, Hort. Univ. i: 220. 1840. 



Cereus heteromorphus Monville, Hort. Univ. i: 221. 1840. 



Cereus longispinus Salm-D>xk, Allg. Gartenz. 13: 354. 1845. 



Cereus pepinianus Lemaire in Salm-Dyck, Allg. Gartenz. 13: 354. 



Cereus subuliferus Salm-Dyck, Allg. Gartenz. 13: 354. 1845. 



Cereus gilvus Salm-Dyck, Allg. Gartenz. 13: 355. 1845. 



Cereus quisco Remy in Gay, Fl. Chilena 3: 19. 1847. 



Cereus linnaei Forster, Hamb. Gartenz. 17: 165. 1861. 



Cereus funkii Schumann, Gesamtb. Kakteen 61. 1897. 



Cereus chilensis pycnacanthus Schumann, Gesamtb. Kakteen 63. 1897. 



Cereus chilensis zizkaanus Schumann, Gesamtb. Kakteen 63. 1897. 



Cereus chilensis panhoplites Schumann, Gesamtb. Kakteen 63. 1897. 



Cereus chilensis poselgeri Schumann, Gesamtb. Kakteen 63. 1897. 



Cereus chilensis heteromorphus Schumann, Gesamtb. Kakteen 63. 1897. 



Cereus chilensis polygonus Schumann, Gesamtb. Kakteen 63, 1897. 



\ 



f 



■i. 



r 





%■ 



Fig. 198, — Trichocereus chiloensis. 



P^IG. 199. — Trichcx:creus chiloensis. 



* Cereus pepinianus was described by Salm-Dyck in 1845 (Allg. Gartenz. 13:354- 1845) who there credits the 

 name to Lemaire. Lemaire evidently had reported the name under some other genus, for m 1850 (balm- Uyck, Cact. 

 Hort. Dyck. 1849. 44, ,97) Salm-Dyck rcdcscribed the species, crediting himself with the name and citing T^hmocactiis 

 pepinianus Cat. Cels" as synonym. The name Echinocactus pepinianus Lemaire occurs first in 1846 (I;orstcr Handb. 

 Cact. 347), but without description. Labouret in 1853 takes it up as Echinocactus echinmdes pepinianus {Monogr. 

 Cact. 178). with the statement that Salm-Dyck considered it synonymous v.ith Cereus pycnacanthus. These two 

 combinations in Echinocactus. while evidenUy referring to Cereus pepinmnus being wiUiout description can not be 

 properly referred here as synonyms. They are, however, both referred by Schumann to Echmocaclus pepinianus. 

 The plant which he describes, however, is different from Cereus pepinianus. If a good Echinocactus, it should be 

 credited to Schumann, with the ritntion to his monograph (Gesamtb. Kakteen 420. 1898;. 



