APPENDIX. 279 
This very interesting plant we have named in honor of Captain Marshall Field, a 
patron of science, who financed the Botanical Expedition of 1922 to South America, sent 
out by the Field Museum of Natural History. 
Figure 250 shows the habit of the plant, 251 a flowering branch, and figures 252 to 
254 show flower, rib, and fruit. 
On page 164, vol. 1, under Carnegiea gigantea, add to illustrations :* Remark, Kakteen- 
freund 19, as Pilocereus giganteus; Nat. Geogr. Mag. 41: 373, aS giant cactus; Tribune 
Hort. 4: 243; Journ. N. Y. Bot. Gard. 3: f. 15, 16,17; 5: 173. f. 27; 6:f. 31, 32; Gartenwelt 
8: 485; 11: 498; Schelle, Handb. Kakteenk. f. 20, 21; Cact. Mex. Bound. frontispiece; 
Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus. 56: pl. 8, f. 1; Useful Wild Pl. U. S. Canada opp. 112; Gartenflora 54: 
589. f. 70; Gard. Chron. 11. 20: 265. f. 39; Rev. Hort. rv. 3: 343. f. 20; Wiener III. Gart. 
Zeit. 11: 216. f. 47; Watson, Cact. Cult. 76. f. 22; Balt. Cact. Journ. 1: 67; Blanc, Cacti 
30. No. 120; Carnegie Institution of Washington 6: pl. 1; De Laet, Cat. Gén. f. 26: 
Monatsschr. Kakteenk. 32: 87, as Cereus giganteus; Contr. U. S. Nat. Herb. 16: pl. 7; 
Amer. Bot. 26: 136; Stand. Cycl. Hort. Bailey; 1: pl. 3; 2:f. 819; Nat. Geogr. Mag. 44: 171. 
On page 167, vol. 11, for Binghamia melanostele, substitute for this name: 
Binghamia multangularis (Willdenow). 
Cactus multangularis Willdenow, Enum. PI. Suppl. 33. 1813. 
Cereus multangularis Haworth, Suppl. Pl. Succ. 75. 1819. 
Echinocereus multangularis Rumpler in Forster, Handb. Cact. ed. 2. 825. 1885. 
Cephalocereus melanostele Vaupel, Bot. Jahrb. Engler 50: Beibl. 111: 12. 1913. 
Binghamia melanostele Britton and Rose, Cactaceae 2: 167. 1921. 
Insert: We have recently obtained a photograph of Haworth’s plant bearing the date 
“Oct. 29, 1824.’ A careful comparison of this photograph with photographs and specimens 
obtained by Dr. Rose in Peru in 1914 con- — 
vinces us that this is the same plant as 
Cephalocereus melanostele which we referred 
to Binghamaia. 
Figure 255 is from a photograph of Ha- 
worth’s plant, from N. E. Brown of Kew. 
On page 171, vol. 1, under Oreocereus 
celsianus, add to illustrations: Karsten and 
Schenck, Vegetationsbilder 7: pl. 42; Mdllers 
Deutsche Gart. Zeit. 25: 473. f.5, No. 11, as 
Pilocereus celsianus; Méllers Deutsche Gart. 
Zeit. 25: 473. f. 5, No. 6, as P. kranzleri;t 
Watson, Cact. Cult. 146. f. 57, as P. bruen- 
nowii; Balt. Cact. Journ. 1: 133, as P. fossu- 
latus; Monatsschr. Kakteenk. 31: 123; 32:9; 
Gartenflora 62: f. 55, as Cereus straussit; 
Millers Deutsche Gart. Zeit. 25: 475. f. 5, 
No. 15, as P. williamsi1; Amer. Mus. Journ. 
16: 39; Bull. Pan Amer. Union 42: 408. 
On page 174, vol. 11, under Cletstocactus 
baumannii, add to illustrations: Deutsches 
Mag. Gart. Blumen. 1851: pl. opp. 48, as 
Cereus tweediei; Jard. Fleur. 1: pl. 48; De 
Laet, Cat. Gén. f. 25; Blanc, Cacti 24. f. 2;. 
West Amer. Sci. 13: 8, as Cereus colubrinus. 
On page 177, vol. 1, under Lophocereus . 
schottii, add to illustrations: Karsten and Schenck, Vegetationsbilder 13: pl. 18, in part; 
i i i i f the plants. 
*So f the illustrations cited here and on pages 166 and 167 do not have the technical name oO 
; This come is credited to Riimpler but he gives the spelling as Pilocereus kanszlert. 
Fic. 255.—Binghamia multangularis. 
