250 



rhi, Vj lin. crassa, perfecte leretia, basi dihUata, incurva, obtusiuscula (ple- 

 raque apice mutilata) pube copiosa adpressa minutissima canescentia. Pa* 

 iiicjila pyramidata, scapo interne tenuiter striato , ramis semipatentibns 

 divaricatisque siibdistichis , infimis folio genuino teretl 1-2-pollicarL suffultis 

 ti-S-pollicaribus racemoso- v. subpaniculato-polycephalis, superioribns sensim 

 brevjoribiis et simplicioribus bractea 4-2 lin. longa fultis, summis ciic- polli- 

 caribus monocephalis, omnibus apice puberulis et squaniiilis nonnullis spha- 

 celatis lanceolatis acutis adpressis lineam longis mnnitis. Calycis limbus 

 niarginesque bvactearum coerulescentes, labioruni laciniae acutinsculae, faux 

 pallida, tubus constrictus rubellus, Nuculae baud suppetunt. 



11- Coil o sperm 11 lu iiiciirvnm Lmdl Meisn. 1. c. p. 523. 



In coHibus circa Toodgay m. Sept. IS4'2 legit Gilbert- No. 70. ( Panicuhi 



^ sesqmpedalis! polystncbja apbylla, scopuria, ramis pedem et ultra longis.) Drum- 

 mond, coll. IL No. 3iJS. 



Speciiiiina bipedalia, fruticosa; radice perpendicular! , seniipedali, sim- 

 plicissima, crocea (omnino C brachjfphylli) caule recto, nunc simplicissimo, 

 nunc apice ranuilo uno alterove brevi folioso Instructo; foliis usque ad V/^ 

 pulL longis, coniplanato-filifonnibus , iitrlnque bisulcis, supra planiusculis, 

 subtus subcarinato-convexis, ^-^^ lin. latis, parum incurvis; inflorescentia 



saepe pyramidato-paniculata, ampla, G-S-pollicari, racemis inferioribus pe- 

 dunculatis 4-5-polliraribus polystacbyis. — Caiilem nunquaui vidimus; dlcbo- 

 tomum, quatis in diagnosi Lindleyana traditur. 



13/1. Coiio^periiiniii caiialiculatiim Meisn. caule fru- 



ticoso, subsiniplici, glabro, laxiuscule folioso; foliis lon- 



»5 



long 



gissimis, semiteretibus, glabris, supra caiialiculatis laevibu 

 dorso convexo substriato-rugiilosis, callo terminali conico 

 acutiusculo sphacelate subrecurvo; peduiiculis termiiialibiis 

 et e summis axillis eloiigatis, aphyllis, supra medium laua- 

 tis et racemoso-polystachyisy spicis peduuculatis laxiuscu- 

 lis; bracttis late obovatis, flore subtriplo brevioribusy laua- 

 tis, cu>;pide brevi glabro ; calycis lanati lobis brevibus 

 apice glabris. 



Swan lliver, Dnimmond. coll. H. No. 307. 



An satis distincta a vero C. Stoechadis Endl.? qnod ex descriptione 

 (Endl. nov, stirp. decad. I. p. 60. n. 68) tamen differt foliis „facie plana 

 obsolete blsulcis," spicis confertis densifloris et calyce 2 lin. (in nostra 3 lin.) 



0. Ab ilia saltern stirpe, quam supra (PI, Preiss. I. p. 524) nomine ('. 

 Stoechadis descripsimns (cul C. sclero^hyUam Lindl. absque dubio identi- 

 cum). C. canaliculatum egregie discrepat caule validiore, foliis lon^ioribus 

 (subpedalibus) crassioribusque, glaberrimis, nunquam teretibus sed constanter 

 canaliculatis, nonnunquam lineam latis, spicis longiuribus laxifloris et talyce 

 dimidio majore. — An i^itur C, sclerophyllum Lindl. restituendum (cu»» 

 synon. C Stoechadis Meisn. non Endl.) et C. canaliculatum Conospenn([ 

 Stoechadis Endl. iit varietas subjungendum? An hae onines unius speiitn 

 varletates? 



14. louo^iiiieriiinni teretifolinin R.Bi\ Meisn. I ^* 



p. 525* 



Swan River, Dnvmniond. coU. II. No. 31 1. 



15. Conoisiierinniti petiolare R.Br. Meisn. I. c. 



Swan River, Druimnond. coll. III. sine No. Bracteae demiun. acnminc drlaC'-f^' 

 Hiulicue. 



