4 Rhodora [JANUARY 
shaded cliff, Gorge of Diamond River, Dartmouth College Grant, Au- 
gust 2, 1914, A. S. Pease, no. 16,153; Alpine Cascade, Gorham, 1873, 
C. E. Faxon, September 4, 1903, Pease, no. 2530; dryish cliffs, Crystal 
Cascade, Pinkham Grant, August 7, 1879, Edwin Faxon, September . 
6, 1907, Pease, no. 10,715; shaded cliffs, Ice Gulch, Randolph, Sept- 
ember 13, 1895, T. O. Fuller & H. A. Purdie, August 28, 1901, Pease, 
no. 25; dry ledges, Mine Brook, Shelburne, August 15, 1908, Pease, 
no. 11,664. Vermont: Mt. Mansfield, August, 1877, Faxon, Pringle, 
and many later collections by others; Smuggler's Notch, Faxon et al.; 
dry sheltered cliffs, Underhill (Nebraska) Notch, Eggleston et al.; 
altitude 1500 ft., Mt. Zion, East Hubbardton, July 17, 1898, Eggles- 
ton & Ross; rocky cliffs, elevation not over 1000 ft., Mt. Zion, September 
1911, Rugg. ONTARIO: rocky cut on Canadian Pacific Ry., Franz, 
June 22, 1921, Pease, no. 17,960; crevices of rocks, Red Rock, Lake 
Superior, June 24, 1884, J. Macoun; Isle St. Ignace, 1866, O.B. 
Wheeler. MicHiGaN: Isle Royale, August 19, 1873, H. Gillman, 
August 6, 1909, W. S. Cooper, no. 27; among rocks, Keweenaw Co., 
August, 1888, Farwell, no. 557; on cliffs of greenstone trap east of 
the Cliff Mine, 1863, J. W. Robbins; Phoenix, August, 1885, T. E. 
Boyce. Wisconsin: St. Croix Falls, 1861, T. J. Hale; Dells of the Wis- 
consin, J. A. Lapham. MINNESOTA: Basswood Lake, L. H. Bailey, 
no. 430; St. Paul, Ellen Cathcart. UPPER AMUR: on shady sloping 
cliffs, August 18, 1891, Korshinski. MIDDLE AMUR: on crags in 
oak copses, June 5, 1891, Korshinski. MANDSHURIA: Amur River, 
1855, R. Maack. JAPAN: Sapporo, October 19, 1903, Arimoto. 
GRAY HERBARIUM 
PLANTS OF THE HAMILTON INLET AND LAKE 
MELVILLE REGION, LABRADOR. 
R. H. WETMORE. 
DurtncG the summer of 1921, the Canadian Government conducted 
a Survey in the region of Hamilton Inlet and Lake Melville, Labrador. 
While on that Survey, during the months of July and August, the 
writer collected the plants listed below. However, this does not 
represent an exhaustive study of the flora of the area covered, for 
the Survey itself was preeminently hydrographical and geological in 
its intent, hence those elements of the work were stressed accordingly; 
also the mode of travel of our party—by motor-boat and canoe— 
was conducive only to botanizing those points at which stops were 
made. 
