PTERYGISUS.—PANTOGRAPHA. 239 
The specimen from Chiriqui in Dr. Staudinger’s collection is labelled Botys appialis, 
Guen., but I cannot find that it has been described. We figure an example from 
Teapa. | | 
4, Pterygisus rhealis, sp.n. (Tab. LXII. fig. 9.) 
Male. Primaries and secondaries creamy-white; the primaries with the base and the costal margin thickly 
spotted with black, and with four narrow black lines crossing from the costal to the inner margin—the 
first two joined on the inner margin, and the second and third connected by a fine line; the secondaries 
crossed by three black lines; the marginal line black ; the fringe creamy-white : head, thorax, abdomen, 
and legs creamy-white, the abdomen banded with black. Expanse 4/5 inch. 
Hab. Mexico, Amula in Guerrero 6000 feet (7. @. Smith). 
Four specimens. 
LOXOSCIA. | 
Lowoscia, Warren, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. (6) vi. p. 476 (1890). 
Mr. Warren makes Botys scinisalis, Walk., the type of this genus; B. mnemusalis, 
Walk., also belongs to it. 
I. Loxoscia mnemusalis. 
Botys mnemusalis, Walk. Cat. xviii. p. 593°. 
Botys sanguiflualis, Leder. Wien. ent. Monats. vii. pp. 374, 470, t. 11. fig. 1. 
Hab. Panama, Chiriqui (Ribbe, in mus. Staudinger).— VENEZUELA 2. Gurana, Essequibo 
River ; Amazons }, 
Of this species I have seen one specimen from Chiriqui and two from South 
America. In Lederer’s figure of B. sanguiflualis the wings are a little more heavily 
marked. 
PANTOGRAPHA. 
Pantographa, Lederer, Wien. ent. Monats. vii. p. 387, t. 3. fig. 3, t. 5. fig. 25 (1863). 
1. Pantographa scripturalis. 
Pionea scripturalis, Guen. Sp. gén. des Lép. viii. p. 378, Delt. et Pyral. t. 4. fig. 11 *; Walk. Cat. 
Xvill. p. 757°. 
Pantographa scripturalis, Leder. Wien. ent. Monats. vii. p. 388, t. 12. fig. 12°. 
Hab. Norru America, Canada 2, United States Mexico, Paso de San Juan in Vera 
Cruz (Schaus); Panama, Chiriqui (Ribbe, in mus. Staudinger), Volcan de Chiriqui 
2000 to 3000 feet (Champion).—Ecuapor ; Amazons, Paré?; Braz? 
Guenée’s figure of P. scripturalis is a very bad one, but I have no “doubt that our 
insect belongs to the same species. We have received very few specimens from within 
our limits, but from Ecuador I have a large series, which show considerable variation 
in size and colour, and in the distinctness of the markings. The smaller examples by 
themselves might perhaps. be considered distinct. 
