HENICOCNEMIS.—ECCRITOTARSUS. 283 
1. Henicocnemis albitarsis. (Tab. XXVII. fig. 19.) 
Henicocnemis albitarsis, Stal, Stett. ent. Zeit. xxiii. p. 820. 2487. 
Hab. Mexico}. 
A typical specimen in the collection of Dr. Signoret is here figured. 
2. Henicocnemis albo-ornata, n. sp. (Tab. XXVII. fig. 20.) 
Black, clothed with white pile; pronotum with two foveate black spots on anterior portion of disk; antennz 
ochraceous ; apical thirds of the first, second, and third joints and the whole of the fourth joint fuscous ; 
legs dark castaneous or black, and clothed with white pile; intermediate tibiee with one and posterior 
tibie with two pale ochraceous annulations ; tarsi pale ochraceous, with their apices black; membrane 
piceous, apices of the cellular margins whitish, and with a whitish spot on each lateral margin. 
Long. 4-44 millim. 
Hab. Panama, Bugaba (Champion). 
This species seems to be closely allied to . patellata, Stél, a species described 
from Rio Janeiro. From the description of Stal’s species, it differs by its smaller 
size, the foveate spots to the pronotum, its white pilosity, different colour of the 
antennee, &c. 
Division BRYOCORARIA, 
Bryocoraria, Reuter, Bih. Vet.-Ak. Handl. iii: 1, p. 6 (1875). 
Cyllocoraria, Reuter, Bih. Vet.-Ak. Handl. iii: 1, p. 6 (1875). 
Cyllecoraria, Reuter, Ofv. Vet.-Ak. Forh. 1875, p. 79. 
As I do not, at present, clearly apprehend the distinction, in all cases, of the above 
divisions proposed by Dr. Reuter, I have, to prevent confusion, and in conformity with 
the course pursued at p. 212 of this work when dealing with some of the late Dr. Stal’s 
divisions, placed them together. In doing this I have no wish or intention to disparage 
the validity of Dr. Reuter’s work; but as this publication is primarily “ faunistic” in 
character, I should, had I adopted that author’s systematic proposals, been compelled 
to make even further divisional separation of genera. 
The antenne being not quite so wide apart as the eyes, appears to be the strongest 
structural difference of the division as here used. 
ECCRITOTARSUS. 
Eccritotarsus, Stal, Rio Jan. Hem. i. p. 57 (1858); Walk. Cat. Het. vi. p. 47 (1872). 
The following is Stal’s complete diagnosis of this genus :—‘‘ Corpus forma, variabile, 
ovale, oblongum, vel elongatum. Membrana unicellulata. Tarsi basi gracillimi 
apicem versus sensim latiores, crassiores.” 
30* 
