SUPPLEMENT. 
Since the commencement [in 1880] of the present volume, which is devoted to the 
families Pentatomide, Coreide, Lygeide, Pyrrhocoride, and Capside, a large number 
of additional specimens, including many new species, have reached the hands of the 
Editors from several sources, but principally from Mr. Champion, embracing the results 
of his collections made in the State of Panama. It is now proposed, in order to include 
the supplementary species of these families in this volume, to enumerate and describe 
this fresh material, making such corrections as are necessary in relation to what has. 
been already published, and to include the additional localities for the previously 
recorded species. 
Subfam. CYDNINE (p. 1). 
Since writing on the Cydnine Dr. Signoret has published an exhaustive treatise on 
the group, and although I submitted most of our specimens to him at the time of 
preparing this portion for the press, his further studies have led to greater precision, — 
so that some corrections require to be made. His loans from the different continental 
museums have resulted in the discovery of many new species, which can now be 
added to our fauna. 
CYRTOMENUS (p. 2). 
Cyrtomenus teter (p. 2). 
Cyrtomenus excavatus (p. 8). 
Cyrtomenus teter, Sign. Ann. Soc. Ent. Fr. ser. 6, i. p. 197, t. 6 (Cydnides, t. 8) fig. 17. 
To the localities given, add :—Guatemata, Purula (Champion). 
The examination of a long series of specimens being now possible, it appears that: 
the male sex is uniformly of the form described by myself as C. excavatus and the 
female of the form figured as C. teter. Dr. Signoret has therefore arrived at the opinion, 
with which I heartily agree, that the two are but the sexes of one species, and that the 
name C. excavatus naturally sinks as a synonym of C. ¢eter. 
Cyrtomenus mirabilis (p. 3). 
To the localities given, add :—Panama, Bugaba (Champion). 
ONALIPS (p. 4; to follow the genus Syllobus). 
Onalips, Signoret, Ann. Soc. Ent. Fr. ser. 6, i. p. 323, t. 10 (Cydnides, t. 6) figg. 48, 44 (1881). 
This genus is thus differentiated by the author from Syllobus:—‘ Lobes latéraux. 
sans dilatation mais arrondis.” . 
