26 SUPPLEMENT. 



[i. p. 235.] 4*. Psoralea rhombifolia, Torr. & A. Gr. Fl. N.Am. i. pp. 303 et 

 688 ; S. Wats, in Proc. Am. Acad. xvii. p. 339. 



Texas.— North Mexico, Monterey, Nuevo Leon (Palmer, 222). 



[i. P . 236.] 2*. Eysenhardtia orthocarpa, S. Wats, in Proc. Am. Acad. xvii. 

 p. 339 (E. amorphoides, huj. op. pro parte). 

 Eysenhardtia amorpkoides var. orthocarpa, A. Gr. PL Wright, ii. p. 37. 



Arizona; New Mexico.— North Mexico, near San Luis Potosi (Parry & Palmer, 

 143 ; Schaffner, 782) ; South Mexico, Tacubaya (Bourgeau, 82 ; Bilimek, 108). Hb. 

 Kew. 



[i. p. 237.] 4*. Dalea aurea, Nutt. ; Torr. & A. Gr. Fl. N. Am. i. p. 308 ; 

 PL Wright, i. p. 46, et ii. p. 41, et PL Lindl. pp. 7 et 31 ; S. Wats, in Proc. Am. Acad, 

 xvii. p. 340. 



Missouri southward.— North Mexico, in the Caracol Mountains, Coahuila (Palmer, 



226). 



[i. p. 237.] 7. Dalea berlandieri, A. Gr. ; S. Wats, in Proc. Am. Acad. xvii. 

 p. 340. 



North Mexico, in the Sierra Madre, south of Saltillo (Palmer, 209). 



[i. p. 239.] 22*. Dalea eriophylla, S. Wats, in Proc. Am. Acad. xvii. p. 340. 

 North Mexico, in the Sierra Madre, forty miles south of Saltillo (Palmer, 211). 



[i. p. 241.] 29. Dalea fhltescens, A. Gr. ; S. Wats, in Proc. Am. Acad. xvii. 

 p. 341. 



North Mexico, in the Sierra Madre, south of Saltillo, at Juraz, Coahuila, and at 

 Monterey, Nuevo Leon (Palmer, 205, 206, 212). 



[i. p. 241.] 30. Dalea greggii, A. Gr. ; S. Wats, in Proc. Am. Acad. xvii. 

 p. 341. 



To this Watson refers Parry and Palmer's 147, 152, and 1048, in part, our 92, 

 Dalea, sp. 



[i. p. 242.] 40*. Dalea lasiathera, A. Gr. PL Wright, i. p. 48, et ii. p. 37 ; 

 S. Wats, in Proc. Am. Acad. xvii. p. 340. 



Texas. — North Mexico, in the Caracol Mountains, Coahuila, and at Guajuco, Nuevo 

 Leon (Palmer, 224, 225). Hb. Kew. 



p.. p. 242.] 44*. Dalea luisana, S. Wats, in Proc. Am. Acad. xvii. p. 341. 



North Mexico, region of San Luis Potosi 6000 to 8000 feet (Parry & Palmer, 164; 

 Schaffner, 808). 



We suspect a transposition of Parry and Palmer's 162 and 164 in the set we had 

 under observation, as Watson refers the former, which we could not match in the 



