4 
received from the celebrated auther of the Flora Peruviana et 
Chilensis, Don Jose Pavon. The celebrated Mutis has, and I 
think too with great propriety, considered his C. lancifolia the 
Quina Naranganda, or Quinguina Orange of Santa Fe, as iden- 
tical with the quina fina de Uritucinga, or Humb. and Bon- 
pland’s C. Condaminea. No description is given of the 
_C. lancifolia of Mutis in the Nova Genera et Species Plan- 
tarum of Humb. Bonpl. and Kunth, and itis probable that they 
were = acquainted with it-only from the drawings of Mutis. 
| ifie character given in the above work does not 
distinguish it in the least from their Condaminea. 
2. C. cordifolia, foliis subrotundo-ovatis acutis basi cordatis 
attenuatisve subtus ramulisque pilosiusculis supra denudatis: 
nitidis, paniculé brachiata diffusa pubescente, dentibus caly- 
cinis laté-rotundatis mucronulatis, sligmate: oaehe, Isapeuite 
oblongocouaaie: -eylindricis ecostatis. 
ae: cordifolia Mut. Mss. Humb. in Maxess, 7 p- 117. 
Rohde Monog. p. 58. Humb,. Bonpl. et Kunth. Nova Gen. et 
‘Spee. Plant. 3. p. 401 (exclus. Synonymis omnibus Fl. Pe- 
ruviane, nee non Linn. Syst. Nat. Vahl et Lambert.) C. sp. 
novir' —o pe see Pavon Mss. iuina amarilla Bogo- 
Habitat nemora aioe an: hictinsi ins Babes Quitensi Picasa 
norum (Pavon) in Regno Novo-granatensi, ubi legit Mutis. — 
_ Genitalia inclusa, filamenta plana dilatata antheris linearibus: 
- dupol breviora’; stigmatis lobis oblongo-ovatis obtusis. 
_ This species is totally different from the Cinehona purpurea, 
__ hirsuta, and ovata (pubescens Vahl) of Flora Peruviana, which 
Humboldt and Bonpland in their before-mentioned work have 
given as synonyms of Mutis’s plant. ‘The specimens I possess 
of it have been examined and named by M. Bonpland while 
