10 
the examination of my intelligent friend Don Francisco Antonio: 
Zea, who recognised them to be the Cinchona microphylla, ani 
unpublished species of Mutis, who gave the Baron de Hum- 
boldt a drawimg of it when the latter was at Santa Fe. Having 
never received specimens of the C. glandulifera of the Fl. Peru- 
eiand, I therefore give it as a synonym with considerable doubt. 
12. C. hirsuta, foliis ovalibus basi acutis ramulisque vwaldé 
setoso-pilosis supra venosis demuin denudatis, floribus glomeratis 
setoso-pilosis, laciniis enon lanceoieine acuminatis, stigmate 
bilobo, fs ovatis. sic | 
Crhirsuta, Fl. Peruviana, 2, p. 1. t. 192. Casearillo del- 
guile, Reiiz Quinolog. p. 60. 
Habitat in Andium montibus nemorosis, altis et htigidis locis 
versus Pillao et Acomayo. (Ruiz et Pavon.) 
Humboldt and Bonpland, in their often-quoted worl have, 
on the authority of Zea, referred this species to the C: cordi-. 
folia of Mutis, with which it has not the Jeast resemblance : 
this: could onl y be expected from their knowing the plant 
merely from the figure and description in the Fl. Peruviana, 
without ever seeing specimens ofit. Having, therefore, obtained 
very fine specimens from the author of the Flora Peruviana, and 
which I have shown to Don Zea, he now quite accords with 
me in considering it a very different species. pe: 
13. C. magnifolia, foliis laté cnbuonetiSeivcl bik supra. desis. 
datis nitidis subtus densé tomentosis, panicula brachiato-corym- 
bosa tomentosa, dentibus calycinis brevibus acutis, laciniis co-. 
rollae_ lanceolatis, antheris inclusis, on exserto, stigmate bi- 
- partito, capsulis linearibus teretibus. 
~€. magnifolia, Fl. Peruviana, 2. p. 52: €. 196. Cnon Heli. 
et Bonpl.) Cascarillo amarillo, Ruiz Quinolog. p. 71. : 
Habitat in Andium nemoribus’ calidissimis prope torrentes 
copiosé ad Chinchao, Cuchero et Chacahuassi. ce: et Payon )} 
