REVUE BRYOLOGIQUE, 
c. col., 19 N. emarginala ( Dill, Ehrh.) B. Gr. ster.et c. col., 
_ 2UN.sphacelata (Gies.) Carringt. set c. col.,21 N. sparsifolia 
Lindb. c. col., 22 Scalia Hookeri (Lyell) B. 6r. æ et © ster., 
23 Fossombronia cristata Lindb. c. fr., 24 Blasia pusilla 
(Mich.) L., B. Gr. c. fr., 25 Pellia epiphylla (Mich., L.) Cord. 
c. fr.; I Frullania Hntchinsiæ (Hook.) N. Es. c. col., II Le- 
jeunia Mackayi (Hook.) Spreng. c. col., II Mastigophora 
Woodsii { Hook.) N. Es. ster., IV Herberta adunca ( Dicks.) 
B. Gr. ster,, V Piagiochila spinulosa (Dill., Dicks.) Dum. 
© ster. 
As Professor Lindberg has rich materials for following 
fasciculi in store, it is to be hoped that the continuation will 
Soon appear. 
7. ARNELL, H. W., De Skandinaviska Lôfmossornas Kalen- 
_ darium (Upsala Universitets Arsskrift, 1875, p. 129, in 
_ Swedish). Price 2,75 kron. ue 
As for this publication see Rev. Bryol. 1876, p. 26-28. Here 
_ itought to be mentioned that in pages 77-129 is given an 
_enumeration of all mosses at that time known from the 
_ Scandinavian peninsula. 
8. Linrgere, S. O, Musci Scandinavici in syslemate novo na- 
_turali dispositi. Upsala, E. Edquist, 1879. Price 1,25 krona 
_ Swedish coin, ; 
9. Fôrteckning oôfver Skandinaviens mossor jemte deras by- e 
_ tesvärden. Upsala, E. Edquist, 4879. Price 1,25 krona. ; 
10. Points fôrteckning ofver Skandinaviens vâzter. 2. Mossor 
_ ordnade efter Hartman’s Flora. Lund, C. W. K. Gleerup, 1879. 
_ Price 50 üre Swedish coin. ET _ 
Already in 1846 J. Angstrôm published an enumeralion 
of the Scandinavian Mosses in Professor E. Fries, Summa 
_ Vegetakilium Scandinaviæ. According to this enumeration 
the number of Scandinavian mosses at that time was 576 
species. The great increase of newly detected species, howe- 
ver, made this enumeration very deficient, on which account 
the above mentioned new enumerations were very welcome. 
The first of these ennmerations bas already been announced 
to the readers of Revue Bryol. (1880, p. 94-95). It seems 
to me to be one of the most important bryological publica- 
tions of recent times on account of the new system there 
framed, and also because it may be said to contain à Com= 
pendium of the author's synonymical opinions, that, different. 
as they are from the current synonymy, must, however, be: 
considered worthy of the greatest attention as founded on 
the most scrupulous and indefatigable examination of all 
_ older sources of bryological lore. The author enumeraies 
_in the first place only those Scandinavian mosses of which 
