SYNOPSIS OF THE GENUS LONICERA. 143 
L. diversifolia, Wallich in Roxburgh, Fl. Ind. ed. 2. 23178 (1824). — 
De Candolle, Prodr. 4% 334 (1830). — Lindley, Bot. Reg. 29, misc. 
78; 80. pl. 33 (1844). — Hooker, Ic. Pl. 9. pl. 807 (1852). — K. 
Muellerin Walpers, Ann. Bot. Syst. 5 : 95 (1858). — K. Koch, Dendr. 
23 23 (1872). — Dippel, Handb. Laubholzh. 13 241. f. 754 (1889).— 
Koehne, D. Dendr, 551 (1893). 
L. Royleana, Wallich, Cat. no. 478 (1828), nom. nud. 
L. diversifolia @ Royleana, De Candolle, Prodr. 43334 (1830). — 
Hooker, Ic. Pl. 9 807 (1852). 
? L. Xylosteum GB leucocarpa, De Candolle, Prodr. 4 3335 (1830), 
L. Xylosteum brachypoda, Schlechtendal, Linnaea 81 : 632 (1862). 
L. translucens, Carriére, Rev. Hort. 18723240 (1872).— Zabel, Gar- 
tenfl. 88:493 (1889).— Mouillefert, Arb. Arbriss. 2: 901 (1892-98). 
Caprifolium quinqueloculare, Kuntze, Rev. Gen. Pl. 13274 (1891). 
Himalayas: Kashmir to Kumaon (Wallich, Thomson, 
Clarke, Falconer, Edgeworth et al.). Afghanistan (Aitchi- 
son). Beluchistan (Lace). China: Hupeh (Henry).— 
Sometimes cultivated (Arnold Arboretum, etc. ). 
Of this variable species chiefly two forms can be dis- 
tinguished ; one has larger flowers with slender tube scarcely 
gibbous, but slightly curved, the other has smaller flowers 
with shorter, distinctly gibbous tube and the leaves of firmer 
texture and acute or somewhat acuminate. By Dippel and 
Koehne the latter form, which was introduced into cultiva- 
tion as L. translucens, is distinguished as L. diversifolia, 
Wall. Probably by mistake Dippel quotes under Z. diver- 
versifolia the illustration in Hooker’s Icones, but repro- 
duces it under L. quinguelocularis, 
By Zabel the following three forms are enumerated 
besides the type: — 
f. DIVERSIFOLIA, (Wallich), Zabel in Beissner, Schelle & 
Zabel, Handb. Laubholz-Ben. 460 (1903). 
f. TRANSLUCENS, (Carritre), Zabel, 1. c. 
f. pumosa, Zabel, |. c., nom. nud. (See also Zabel, Gar- 
tenfl. 38 : 493 under Z. translucens. ) 
