BOTANICAL NOTES. 209 
ANACARDIACEAE. 
Buchanania arhorescens (Bhime) Blume, 6970, local name viogniogan. , 
ICACINACEAE. 
F 
lodes philippinensis Meir. in Philip. Journ. Sci. 3 (1908) Bot. 241. 
Represented by 9263; other distribution Leyte, ^Masbate, Cebu, Romblon, ^lin- 
doro, Palawan. 
Phytocrene blancoi (Azaola) Merr. in Philip. Joiirn. Sci. 2 (1007) Bot. 432. 
Represented by 10339; other distribution Bulacan, Rizal, Lagima, Leyte, and 
Mindanao. 
SAPINDACEAE. 
Allophylus ieucocladus Radlk. supra 181. 
I 
Only known collection, 6880, ^ 
Allophylus ternatus (Forst.) Radlk. in En-1. & Prantl Nat. Pflanzenf. 3' 
(1895) 313. 
Represented by 6953; other Philippine distribution Cagayan, Tayabas, Albay, 
Leyte, Mindoro, Mindanao, Basilan, and Zanibulcs. 
^ 
Dictyophora rhomboidea Radlk. supra 182. 
Only known collection, 10359. 
Mischocarpus sundaicus Bl. Bijdr. (1825) 238. 
Represented by 9070, 9179; other Philippine distribution Nueva Ecija, Davao; 
local name saJah, 
r 
J 
Otophora oliviformis Radlk. supra 181. 
Only known collection, 10330. 
Trigonachras cuspidata Radlk. supra 182. 
Only known collection, For. Bur. Ull Hagger. 
RHAMNACEAE. 
Colubrina asiafica (Linn.) Brongn., 6955, local name a^baiUi: Gouama mico- 
cai-pa DC, GSS2, 90G0. 
VITACEAE. . 
Ampelocissus imperialis (Miq.) Planch, in DC. Monogr. ?''«"• ^ / ['^^''^"f. 
• This species, or more exactly the variety lohata, is rcpresen ed by 10713, 
other distribution (species and variety) Tayabas, Mindanao, Culion, Sumatra, 
Borneo, probably Java. 
Leea congesta Elmer Leail. Philip. Bot. 1 (1908) 318. 
Two collections, 6850 and 10375, both fruiting, agree ^^^ll ^vith .^^^ typ ma 
terial, except that the leaflets and petioles are longer. Other distribution Ilocos 
Norte, Benguet, Rizal, Tayabas, Mindanao. 
L«a negrosensis Elmer Lcafl. Philip. Bot. 2 (1908) 494. . ,_^,.^^^„„.^ 
It seems probable that this species is represented by 6839, the "1-™ 
and flowers being entirely similar, except that the '*ly'=^^»'•^'"'"':*'^'^„P"'f ' ", 
and smaller by half than as described for the type, agreemg in this "^P^^* ^' J 
the specimen of the latter here, both differences P-bably due t° J^'^^;"- '", 
age. There is more dimcultv with the leaves. Of the Pol.llo plant, t«o leaves 
