296 The Philippine Journal of Science 1922 
TABLE 8.—Showing average scores of Baguio teachers taken in groups of 
educational attainment. 
[Q. C. D., Quartile coefficient of dispersion.] 
— 
Men, Women. 
Group. x 
a Score. | Q.C.D. — Score. | Q.C.D. 
First-year high school and normal school . -__--- 46} 112.1 0.10 18 95.5 | 0.19 
Second-year high school and normal school-_.--- 13 | 116.0 0.11 pe eae} Ee Bs Ripe tomer 
Third-year high school and normal school ------ 11} 116.1 0.19 71, (ie 0 | wee 
Fourth-year and graduate normal school_-__.... 47) 128.2 0.18 22} 125.9) 0.09 
Fourth-year and graduate high school ...._...-- 16 | 129.7 0,08 4} 106.7} 0.07 
College graduates and undergraduates --_------- 83] 129.9 0.18 5} 186.8/| 0.04 
ys <1 Sees tae Nesp mics Se CaO ecoeee IGS eles = B01 co cece few erat 
teachers amounted to more than 50 points, this difference in 
the Baguio group amounts to but some 17 points (men only). 
First-year high- and normal-schoo] men in the provincial group 
scored 73.5, while the same group among the Baguio teachers 
scored 112.1. The teachers who convene annually at Baguio 
are among the best teachers in the service. They are carefully 
selected by their respective division superintendents and sent 
to Baguio at Government expense to take part in various con- 
ferences and to learn of new ideas and methods in education. 
Tables 4 and 8 would seem to prove that schooling has but a 
slight influence, even among Filipinos, on the scores obtained 
in tests of native mental ability. 
TABLE 9.—Showing average scores of various racial types—Baguio group. 
Men. Women. 
A Average 
verage 
Number.} Range. |“ core, | Number.| Range. | “score. 
Malay - 52| 54-183 121 32| 62-158 116 
Spanish-mestizo ...............---.- 19| 111-152 124; 4| 128-157 140 
Indonesian - ei 40 84-161 bal Rl pein Mier ceetea ea pene oo 
Proto-Maliy 23525 a 10 85-166 Pr a haces ce eres 
Chi tf “ee 19| 97-189 132 7} 88-171 129 
The Baguio group was too small and too carefully selected 
to bring to light facts of general applicability. However, each 
individual was classified as to his physical or racial type. Many 
of the individuals were much mixed, racially, and the classifica- 
tion, therefore, was far from satisfactory. But the average 
scores of the various racial types are given in Table 9, not so 
much to indicate the relative intelligence of these Philippine 
