20, 5 Cushman: Oriental and Australian Ichneumonide 585 
face of propodeum, spiracles small, round; apical abscissa of 
radius slightly decurved; discocubitus subangulate at about its 
basal third; nervulus barely antefurcal; nervellus inclivous, 
broken below middle; hind tibia strongly compressed, as broad as 
femur. First four tergites striate, others polished, fifth weakly 
striate at base; first distinctly longer than wide at apex, spi- 
racles just behind middle; second and third tergites each with 
a transverse area set off by basal and subapical curved furrows; 
fifth constricted near base; ovipositor less than half as long as 
. first tergite. 
Ferruginous, with head and abdomen beyond second segment 
black; antennze brown, scape and pedicel testaceous; mandibles 
pale, the oral margins more or less red; palpi stramineous; 
tegule and humeral angles stramineous, radices of wings and 
base of stigma white; wings hyaline, the front wing weakly 
stained to basal vein, with a broad dark band across the broadest 
part, and a small obscure spot on the nervulus; hind wing im- 
maculate; legs testaceous, hind femur largely piceous, tibia 
fuscous, with a white basal annulus and obscurely pale in the 
middle, tarsus fuscous; middle tibia with same color pattern 
obscurely developed; tergites beyond second piceous black. 
Type locality Manila, Philippine Islands. 
Type.—Catalogue No. 24057, United States National Museum. 
One female taken by Rev. Robert Brown. 
Genus CHRYSOCRYPTUS Cameron 
The species described below is apparently very closely allied 
to, if not the same as, the undescribed male referred by Roman *° 
to this genus and on the strength of which that author synonym-. 
ized Cameron’s genus with Leptocryptus Thomson, especially the 
subgenus Panargyrops Foerster. Roman was of the opinion 
that Cameron mistook the costellz for the spiracles. 
The species before me differs in several respects from Cam- 
eron’s description, as follows: The spiracles are round instead 
of linear; the ovipositor sheath is clothed with black instead of 
white hair; the first three joints of the flagellum are not four 
times as long as thick; the discocubitus is angulate and with a 
very short ramellus; the clypeus is distinctly tridenticulate at 
apex; the areola is not rounded at base; and the radius is not 
thickly pilose at base. From the genotype as described it differs 
markedly also in being entirely bright ferruginous with the legs 
uniformly testaceous and the wings entirely hyaline. Because 
of these differences I refer it very doubtfully to Chrysocryptus. 
” Arkiv, Zool. 8” (1913) 9. 
