Name of tribe. < 
Habitat. 
Blumentritt’s list. Jesuit list. 
23. Tlongotes _______- 19. Dlonpotes 2.5: Boundary region of Nueva Vizcaya and Principe; | 
also Nueva Ecija. | 
7 OO ag 5 te SR AU; TOV OR coal. oe Western slopes of the cordillera of Palanan (Blu- 
mentritt). Banks of River Ilaron and eastern 
slopes of Sierra Madre on the side of Nueva Viz- | 
; caya, Isabela, and Cagayan (Jesuits). 
Wo MING Osi wee rave roi \) Sa alo Nueva Vizcaya (Blumentritt). Panay (Jesuits), | 
26. Italones ____-____ 22 sttelones .|._-._- Nueva Vizcaya. — 
27. Itetapanes ______- 23. Itetapanes .-..... Western Isabela and possibly Bontoe (Blumen- 
tritt). Territory east of the Busaos, bounded 
on the south by the Igorrotes of Benguet and 
on the north by the Guinaanes (Jesuits). 
Logg | 1 SR yas 2 Ea Sa a ane Central (?) Luzon. 
CE es ie a a a a es Southwest corner of Isabela and northwest cor- | 
ner of Nueva Vizcaya. 
ee ES a i Territory west of Malaueg, Cagayan. 
Bh. OMTILOS oe. CORI AT ag ins Different parts of Luzon (Blumentritt), Bataan, 
North and South Ilokos, and Nueva Ecija 
(Jesuits). 
Be PEO Y Glee eal tt Western Nueva Vizcaya or Isabela, 
Og OT RRS a A ane a Not given. 
34. Quianganes______ 25. Quianganes_____--| Comandancia of Quiangan, Nueva Vizcaya. 
Shia CES OTE ca Re eet ee ee Do. 
36. Tinguianes _____-| 26. Tinguianes ______- Abra and North and South Ilokos (Blumentritt), 
Cordillera of Tila and Provinee of Abra 
(Jesuits). 
It will be noted that the Jesuits enumerate but twenty-six tribes while 
Blumentritt lists thirty-six. The Alimut, Altasanes, Bayabonanes, Bu- 
juanos, Bungananes, Dadayag, Gamungan, Ifumangies, Ilamut, Ileaba- 
nes, Jumangi, Mayoyaos, Nabayuganes, Panuipuyes, Pungianes, and 
Silipanes do not appear in the Jesuit list, and on the other hand the 
Aetas, Attas, Buquiles, Burics, Balugas, and Dumagas of the Jesuit 
list are omitted by Blumentritt, and rightly so, as all of these peoples 
except the Burics are Negritos, while the word buric means tattooed or 
painted and is used in describing certain tattooed persons. It is not a 
tribal name. 
In 1902 Dr. David P. Barrows, at that time Chief of the Bureau of 
Non-Christian Tribes, wrote for the Census of the Philippine Islands 
a history of the non-Christian tribes of the Philippines* in which he 
makes the following statement : 
One impression that has gained foothold in regard to the tribes of the Philip- 
pines I believe to be erroneous, and that is as to the number of distinct types or 
races and multiplicity of tribes. Owing to the fact that nowhere in the Phil- 
ippines do we encounter large political bodies or units, we have a superlative 
number of designations for what are practically identical people. The tribe itself 
* Census of the Philippine Islands of 1903 (1905), 1, 453-477. 
