‘ 
ey 
i 
AB ey ee 
Pid 2 
PS Ren ees oe ee ee, Ag 
v2 
Si ial itn aL cael ar er 
SV ee to le 
968 
Taste X1I.—Bacteriolysis of the fifteen types of dysentery bacilli with anti-dysenteric 
horse serum, ‘Tokio I’? and “Shiga.” 
Anti-dysenteric serum, Anti-dysenteri¢ serum, 
“Tokyo I’ (acid). “Shiga’’ (non-acid). 
ud npr ora ] | ji | ot. ae s 
Aci * os 
Mannite | ; 3 ; 3 Limit 
ked fo hata Limit of 
Type. Speke _ fermenta- = : df 3 : of ag- 
ere pe rg tion. | 3 = 3 — a d gluti- 
cparce i |g 3 4s S nation. 
seal e [er 5 N * " or 
Bacteriolysis. Bacteriolysis. 
ia “eee poe: mime °° Geta ey =f 
PS ici: ieee —- | - | - | -- |—(t-20)] -— | + | -- {1+1,000 
B Port Arthur___ Em eae Wea WERE Fe GS ee a a open oS 
CT POI nescccsns | ; — | | — | - |—(@-20)} - | — | — /1-1,000 
D | Rio-yang 11../fNomecta--y) fg | | |) atop | | | + ft4, 000 
Bi Boren Tie | —_ os ae -- | —(1-20)] -. | + -. {1-1,000 
F | Wakayama I[__| _ i fos ae | ERE a -.. 1-1,000 
GC ETORY6 Tens. cw foe foes [+ $1,000 — | - | -- 4 de g00 
a; OM A Y See ~ ica _ -- | 1-1, 000 st aS + |1-2,000 
I Rio-yang I - ey Se te -_ | 1-500 -|— -- /1-1,000 
J | Baltie 1... | fp ay + 11-900] ] — | — | 2-00 
K | Tokyo III _____! )Acid_------ BROS Fs” . |) aR SS | eon 
L | Yamaguchi __- Je + Ar a 1-300 - os -- /|1-1,000 
Mi Pokto Lvs a. i een oe coe ee OA) ed a Paes es 
Na eOrea. TLL sis 2 = ties + ote 1-500 task un — 1-2,000 
Oar \ erat te ee be We be dee |e eA OTT reeset: OO 
i i 
aa ae ewe i ae |=" Trews - Seo 7 i » | al = 
The last table, XI, shows that with anti-dysenteric horse serum the 
evidences of “cross bacteriolysis” between both types can also be obtained. 
If we omit the results with the “D” type (Rio-yang II, non-acid) we 
should be led to the wrong conclusion, namely, that cross bacteriolysis 
did not exist in the bacteriolysis with the anti-dysenteric horse serum 
of the “G” type (Tokyo I),; this would also be the case with the horse 
serum from “A” type (Shiga), and if, in these tests, we had not the 
results with “H” (Korea IT) and “K” (Tokyo IIT) we would arrive at 
the same faulty conclusion. It therefore is apparent why bacteriolytic 
tests have frequently led various authors to conform to the opinions of 
Lentz. In Table XI we can also see the nonconformity of the fermen- 
tation and agglutination tests with the bacteriolytic reactions. We can 
observe the positive bacteriolysis of the non-acid type “D” (Rio-yang IT) 
with anti-dysenteric serum from the acid type and the negative reaction 
of types “C” (Yalu) and “EF”? (Wakayama I) with the homologous—i. e., 
non-acid—anti-dysenteric serum from “A” (Shiga). A further study 
of Table XII will reveal a number of other cross bacteriolytic reactions 
and also many negative ones with the homologous anti-dysenteric sera. 
Among the latter we will also find that the “A” (Shiga) type shows no 
evidence of bacteriolysis by the anti-dysenteric, rabbit serum “B” (Port 
Arthur). 
pul ia 
