halen ees Te he eee ne te 4 eth ct ti Wie MM hy - Fearne Se eae, a aa eee 
1042 
described by Kobert is not primary. The fact that bacteria can grow in 
the presence of saponin indicates that it is not a universal protoplasmic 
poison, although it is possible that the bacteria may be protected against 
the drug by their membranes. 
(1) 
(2) 
(3) 
(4) 
(5) 
(6) 
(7) 
(8) 
(9) 
(10) 
(11) 
(12) 
LITERATURE, 
Bashford, E. F.: Quoted by Sachs, p. 16. 
Besredka: See L’Immunité, ete., by E. Metchnikoff, Paris (1901), 410. 
Ehrlich, Paul: Schlussbetrachtungen. Alfred Hilder, Wien (1901). 
Kobert, Rudolf: Lehrbuch der Intowikationen. Second edition; Stuttg. 
(1902), 1 
Kruskal, N.: Arb. der Pharmakol. Inst., Dorpat (1891), 6, 1-88. 
Madsen, Th.: Brit. Med. Journ. (1904), 2, 571. 
Pachorukow, D.: Arb. der Pharmakol. Inst., Dorpat (1888), 1, 1-56. 
Ransom, F.: Saponin und sein Gegengift. Deutsch. med. Wehnsch. (1901) 
No. 13, 194-196. 
Sachs, Hans.: Die Haemolysine und Immunitiitslehre, etc. Reprint from 
Ergeb. Allg. Path. (Lubarsch u. Ostertag) (1902), 7, 15, 
Schanzenbach, W.: Zur Kenntniss der hiimolytischen Saponinwirkung. 
Miinchen. med. Wehnsch, (1902), No. 44. 
V. Schulz, W.: Arb. der Pharmakol. Inst., Dorpat (1886), 11-12. 
Stewart, G. N.: Am. J. Physiology (1903), 8, 103-138; and 9, 72-81. 
