17, 2 Morrison: Philippine Nondiaspine Coccide 169 
with a minute threadlike continuation of the bottom of each, 
also quite numerous, and with numerous quinquelocular disk 
pores, all of these obviously arranged in transverse rows accord- 
ing to the segmental divisions; thus with five different types 
of gland pores in this species; dorsally in addition to the large 
spines already described, with transverse segmental rows of mi- 
nute conical spines; without spines ventrally, but with trans- 
verse segmental rows of relatively long slender hairs, these 
varying greatly in length among themselves; anal ring small, 
nearly circular, with six setz, the longest about 90 » long, and 
with two rows of pores on each half. 
Young larva.—No satisfactory mounts of this stage obtained, 
but apparently with the paired spines of the adult present and 
in much the same arrangement, and with some, at least, of the 
same gland pore types present. : 
The species has been described from six adults and four larve 
mounted on slides, and from a small additional amount of mate- 
rial originally preserved in liquid but now dried out. The speci- 
mens are all from Manila, some from Ficus (20158), some from 
“wild plant” (20176), and some from wild fig (without number), 
all collected by Geo. Compere, exact date of collection not stated. 
The types are in the United States National collection of 
Coccide. : 
The presumed relationships of this genus and species have 
been indicated in the previous discussion of the genus. So far 
as my acquaintance with this group of coccids extends, it is 
rather unusual to find five different types of secreting gland pores 
in a single species. 
Genus PHENACOCCUS Cockerell 
This genus as limited here is characterized only by the oc- 
currence of 9-segmented antenne in the adult female. The ce- 
rarii of the single species included from the Philippines are 
poorly developed, in contrast to the usual condition in Pseudo- 
coccus and in the two preceding genera. 
Phenacoccus hirsutus Green. 
2 Phenacoccus hirsutus GREEN, Mem. Dept. Agr. Ind. 27 (1908) 25. 
This species may be separated from the other known Philip- 
pine members of the group by the characters given in the gen- 
eric key. Whether it will remain in the genus Phenacoccus 
when any generic revision of this subfamily is undertaken is 
very doubtful. There is no tooth on the tarsal claw, and there 
are only about six distinguishable pairs of cerarian spines on the 
‘ 
