on the Hortus Malabaricus, Part IV. 233 
Prioris insuper foliola breviora, profundius incisa; sed plus minus speciem 
non distinguit. 
Kari Bepou, seu Beru, p. 109. tab. 53. 
By the vulgar of Malabar this is reckoned to belong to the same genus with 
the preceding; but the Brahmans, whether they call it Karabou or Cari Beu, 
think it different; for the Melia they call Nimbou, evidently derived from 
Nimba of the Sanscrita; so that the terminal Bow or Beo cannot be reckoned 
a generic name, as Rheede would seem to have thought. 
Commeline appears to have entertained no doubt that this should be placed 
in the same genus Nimbo with the dria Bepou ; and from Plukenet (Alm. 269.) 
I learn that both he and Breynius were of the same opinion, the latter. calling 
it an Azadirachta, while Plukenet called it Olea Malabarica Nimbo dicta fructu 
rotundiore, although it must be observed that its fruit has not even the slight 
resemblance to an Olive which the fruit of the dria Bepou possesses, but is 
evidently a berry ; and the filamenta being distinct, it cannot even belong to 
the order of Melia. 
_ I find no notice of this plant in subsequent authors; but were it not that 
Rheede describes it as a lofty tree, I should have little hesitation in considering 
it as the Bergera Kenigii, which in the Tamul language, a dialect of that 
spoken in Malabar, is called Kari Vepa (Hort. Beng. 32.), evidently the same 
name with Kari Bepu. At any rate, there can be no doubt of both plants 
belonging to the same genus, which differs in no respect from the Murraya 
exotica, that is, the Camunium japonicum of Rumphius (Herb. Amb. v. 29. 
t. 18. f.2.) ; nor from the Calchas paniculata, that is, the Camunium javanicum 
of Rumphius (Herb. Amb. v. 27. t. 27). As I consider it thus absolutely 
necessary to unite three Linnæan genera, I would propose that the name 
Camunium, given by Rumphius to two of the three, should [be restored. 
Leaving these two to be treated of in a Commentary on the Herbarium 
Amboinense, I shall here confine myself to give an account of the Bergera 
Kanigii, and to point out in what respects the Kari Bepou differs. The 
plant, which I call Bergera Kenigii, I was assured by Dr. Roxburgh was 
pointed out to him by Koenig himself, and it agrees sufficiently with the 
character given by Willdenow ; but if this author actually meant the Papaja 
