* 
148 .. Co VEELEY' s Remarks on the Nature 
^ 
P A 
-analogy to. fapport: it,  tlirbpglnsütodbe: whole: vegetable creation. 
The locality of two.fuch bodies demonftrates their refpective func- 
tions to. be: diametrically oppofite; for; while the favourite idea of 
florefcence:'may fageeft. the poflibility of external communication, 
between the minute filaments on the furface and the fru&ified fam- 
mits which: contaimthe feeds, the fituation of the fecond flower in a 
bladder, fo i impervious as to retain its internal air, neceffarily excl udes- 
: the poflibility of a groffer body efcaping externally through fuch a 
hould | it: be, « aflerted d,.that the. :fecundating : principle 
| a nature as to find am in-- 
ous texture of the frond itfelf ; 
IA ese “eal dices r hall hereafter affign, I cannot admit 
that it exifls in thofe AE yet I concur in. the general principle. 
It is. what I have. chiefly endeavoured. to. point out in my:former tract 
upon Suiadaliefho: al’ Mani to io the te etit of. the gogenious 
te faa emt mie T “This is“ 3 that ee princi-. 
ple” which I before afferted . to. exit, and. upon: the. apparent ceco-. 
nomy and wifdom of the Divine Author, “who has admirably tem- 
| pered. the conflituent principles of natural | bodies in fuch due pres 
stant be anh id fi then fo nse ond pui 
| 1dden fa vn 3 re m ners pth their 
ink T table confe, and dete figa their effects to the PRS 
už 
i* e Fucus faébarinus under. the mike 5 
At fir fi ight I Fite? — iat dicovered ihe feeds am that Fucus, ` n Lge 
| + Hakes, Mec vt s r 
p ` mechanical 
