114 Mr* Turner's Remarks upon 
32. H.prolirum, Dicks, seems to differ from the preceding num- 
ber (H. riparioides, Hedw.) only in having grown in a situation 
where it was drawn by the current to a greater length. 
37- Dillenius appears to have mixed under this number speci- 
mens of H. lutescens and nitens ; the former, " e Monte Wedden- 
berg" the latter " epratis uliginosis circa Gissam." 
39. Can hardly be any thing more than a small variety of 
H. squarrosum. 
52. H. murale, Dicks. — I could discover no difference between 
this and H. confertum, Dicks. 
64. This number has been uniformly quoted as H. serpens, Linn. 
and the figure appears to have been taken from that species ; but 
I am much mistaken if all the specimens do not belong to Leskea 
subtilis, Hedw. 
Of 72. and 73. there are no specimens. 
BRYUM. 
No. 4. Hudson has referred this number to Splachnum vasculo- 
sum, Linn, and Mr. Dickson to his S. ovatum ; but the specimens 
agree with his *S. gracile. 
16. A. and B. are Dicranum scoparium; C. Dicranum poly set um 9 
Swartz.; and D. a species not yet described, which is to appear 
in the Flora Britannica under the name of Dicranum majus. 
27. Of this number, B. C. D. E. are Trichostomum canescens ; 
A. F. G. Trichostomum heterostichum. 
41. Bryurn polyphyllum, Dicks. ; widely different from Fissidens 
polycarpos, Hedw. with which Hedwig and Hoffman have united it. 
Having now concluded my remarks upon the Dillenian Herba- 
rium, I must further trespass on the indulgence of the Linnean 
Society, by observing that, when I began these observations, the 
idea 
