218 Mr. Brown, on the Proteacee of Jussieu. 
^ There is no means of determining the genus of this plant, but 
it is rather more probably a Leucadendron than belonging 
to any other. | 
LrUCADENDRON?? 
Conocarpodendron ; acaulon ; folio rigido, nervoso, oblongo, 
latiori; cono fusco; semine oblongo, in medid quasi exca- 
vato. Boerh. Lugd. Bat. 9. p. 201. c. tab. : 
I know not what to make of this. If the strobilus and nuces 
at the bottom of the plate really belong to it, it must be re- 
ferred to Leucadendron, and will stand near L. retusum or 
L. plumosum ; but there are some circumstances both in the 
figure and description which render this very doubtful. 
Thunberg refers it to his P. strobilina, but the deseri ptions 
bynomeansagree. |. .. 5 oR 
LEUCADENDRON ? p 
Scolymocephalus ies folio, „Sherard, in Raj. Hist. 3. Dendr. 
d 10. 
This, according to ee is his n ano oian, &c. 
2. p. 107. & Tab which I have considered as the female of 
Leucadendron squarrosum. 
| Riv Pg | Of G xo és 
‚ ;Protea glabra. Thunb. Diss. n. .59.. 
“From the very short and unsatisfactory description of Thun- 
Mee os the genus.of this plant cannot be determined, or even 
-"with much panbability: guessed ataa Tn 5 
IsorocoN. — < 
Protea divites PR Repos. 465. 
an this be a variety.of. — anemonifolius 2... The yellow 
omit flowers 
