Mr. Brown, on the Proteaceae of Jussicu. 219 
flowers satisfy me that it is not a species of Serruria, and 
prevent me at the same time from referring it to Isopogon 
anethifolius, whose leaves are not. unlike, but shore flowers 
are of a very different colour. = | | 
PROTEA. Iniifüs lade RT 4^ TÓ COT M 
Protéa venosa. © Lam. Illust. Gen. 1. p.234. n. 1212. Poiret. 
- Encyc. Botan. 5. p. 640. 
Said by Poiret to resemble in most em crema Protea ipia: ; 
it ed therefore be a gane — d | 
f nrar Gee reas OEA f 
Ths edid JT oia 
5 Sdglypnodenduos, A rent ex Monte Tabulari. Pluk Mant. 168. 
4 AA2 fi Ar 
This is manifestly a Protea, : which it appears Plukenet had seen 
only in the possession of Woodward. The head, especially 
in the form of the bractex, bears a great resemblance to 
"that of Protea cynaroides; but the leaves are so very different, 
that, unless we suppose they were drawn from memory and 
 disproportionately reduced, it cannot be referred to this 
» species It is probably however one of the more common 
kinds, and I know not what else to suppose it may be, except 
Protea grandiflora. The figure itself has never, so far as T 
know, been noticed by any author. 
LEUCOSPERMUM. ocd sy | 
Scolymocephalus poets ver in summitate profundiüs 
crenatis, intercreniis majoribus florum staminulis longis re- 
curvis. Raj. Hist. 3. Dendr. p. 10. 
This is probably a Leucospermum, a and ven L. elliptic 
2F2 | es; ? 
