the Abbé Wulfen s- Defcriptions of Lichens, 33 
| No. 187. L. polyphyllus. p. 190. ` iaj 
Certainly not fo, nor in any manner refembling it, but the 
moft common appearance of L. miniatus Linn, juft as I have found 
it in Scotland and Derbyfhire, and as it is püblifhed by Me, Pick: 
Eus in vue Meg oF bes Plants. oe ibis: 
ert rt 
No. 188. L. hold p. 192. 
We have here a good figure of Li muralis of Schreber and Dick- 
fon, faxicola of Pollich. There is no teafon why the name muralis 
fhould be changed, although not - very good, efpecially as that of 
ecbroleucus has been given with more propriety to another fpecies 
by Entbare 
“No. 189. L. olivaceus. p 194. 
In this the author i is € right, and his remarks on it are 
very LT 103 th H 364 iv E | 
á * 
No. 190. d. prese. a on 
-Fam n forty I cannot fay the fame of this. It is - no means the 
eomphalodes of Linn. and all authors, which is nearly allied to /avatilts, 
and perhaps not fpecifically diftin& from that fpecies. The plant 
here defcribed by Mr. Wulfen is the variety of L. féllaris men- 
tioned by Hudfon and Lightfoot; probably a diftinét fpecies from 
the common fellaris, and totally different from olivaceus, to which 
Mr. Wulfen thinks it allied. 
In the quotation of Micheli he is totally wrong, and corrects 
Linnæus extremely mal à propos; for this author rightly quotes 
Micheli ab. 49. f. 2. for real L. omphalodes in Flora Lapponica 
and Flo. Suecica; and the reafon he omitted to cite him in the 
Species Plantarum was that he preferred the figures of Dillenius 
and Vaillant, efpecially as Micheli did not find the plant himfelf, 
but 
