i4 Dr. Smiru’s Remarks, &e. 
but received it from the laft-mentioned author, and confequently 
his own information is lefs original. 
No. 191. L. pulchellus. p. 199. 
This appears to be the L. tenellus of Weber, fo common on 
trees and bufhes in England, and confounded by Linnzus with L. 
ciliaris ; except that the author {fays it always grows on ftones, and 
never on trees. The citation of Micheli is probably wrong, as he 
does not mention the ciliz of the leaves. 
Fr, 
The multitude of errors I have taken the liberty to notice, ought 
by no means to detract from the credit of this able and candid bo- 
tanift, whofe accuracy and care are fo well known, that fuch errors 
can only be attributed to his labouring alone in the ftudy of thefe 
very difficult plants, without the helps which converfíátión with 
others would have afforded him. Of the moft eminent botanifts 
with whom it has béen! my fortune to converfe, fcarcely more than 
three or four have attended carefully to Lichens; and the greater 
‘part, even of thofe who have written on the fubject, are very 
much miftaken in determining the Linnean fpecies, though af- 
 fifted by Dilleniuss matchlefs work. — 
IV. Æ- 
