226 Mr. DryANper’s Remarks om 
Page 399. .The fpecimen in Linné’s herbarium, from whicte 
the differentia fpecifica of Rhamnus micranthus, and the defcription in 
Ameen. Academ. were made, is Boehmeria ramiflora, p. 267; but the 
fynonyms belong to a fpecies of Celtis, taken up in Swartz's prodr. 
under the name of micrantha. 
Rhamnus ellipticus of Swartz and Hort. Kew. and, p. 402, Ceanothus 
rechnatus of L'Heritier, are the fame; and the Editor quotes the 
fame figure of Browne for both. 
- Page 403. Me/a of Forfkahl is the fame genus as, p. 370. Bwo- 
botrys of Foffter ; Forfkahl’s plant is called by Vahl,  fymb. I. p. 1% 
Bæobotrys lanceolata. 
Page 408. Rubentia of Commerfon and Juflieu is the fame as, 
p. 417. Eleodendrum of Jacquin. 
Page 409. Diofma unicapfularis of Linn. Suppl. is the fame 
as, p. 268, Empleurum Aioni, Empleurum ferrulatum of Hort. 
Kew. 
Disfma oderatifima of Montin, and Diofma latifolia of Linn. Suppl. 
are the fame. : 
~ Page 418. "There is no reafon to fuppofe that Mangifera Amba 
of Forfkahl is different from Mangifera indica, in which Jacquin 
has found the ftamina fuch as Forfkàhl defcribes them in Amba, 
See ic. vol. 2. and collect. 4. p. 97. 
Page 422. Loghania of Scopoli; n. 1076, (mifprinted 1476,) is, 
by his own account, Souroubea of PM and confequently Ruy/chia 
Surubea, p. 407. 
So far I had written when I received the firft part of the firft 
volume of the 'Tranfactions of the Society of Natural Hiftory of 
Paris, in which M. Lamarck has given a memoire on this fubject s 
but not having had tease to examine this edition thoroughly, 
the 
M 
